Plaintiff cannot represent estate in medical negligence case without lawyer: Ontario Superior Court

The lawsuit's potential complexity and financial implications required professional legal guidance

Plaintiff cannot represent estate in medical negligence case without lawyer: Ontario Superior Court

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice refused to allow the plaintiff to act on behalf of an estate in a medical negligence lawsuit without a lawyer, upholding the requirement that estates must be represented by legal counsel.

Jennifer Scarangella initiated the lawsuit after the death of her partner, who passed away in 2021. He was transported by ambulance to Oakville Trafalgar Memorial Hospital and admitted to intensive care.  He remained in the hospital until he passed away.

Scarangella brought a medical malpractice claim on behalf of herself under the Family Law Act (FLA) and as the estate's representative. However, she sought to proceed without a lawyer, despite not being a lawyer herself. The defendants argued that Rule 15.01(1) mandates that estates must be represented by legal counsel.

The Superior Court noted that Scarangella had made some attempts to retain legal counsel, including contacting the Law Society of Ontario for referrals, but could not secure a lawyer for the estate. However, the court found no evidence that she had exhausted all options to retain counsel. Additionally, Scarangella did not demonstrate financial incapacity to hire a lawyer, stating she could afford representation, which diminished the access to justice argument she presented.

In its decision, the court referenced previous cases where the rule requiring legal representation for estates was relaxed under specific circumstances. However, the court distinguished Scarangella’s case from those precedents, noting that the defendants had promptly raised the issue, and the lawsuit’s potential complexity and financial implications necessitated professional legal guidance. The court also raised concerns about the risk to estate beneficiaries, as the case could lead to significant costs if unsuccessful.

Ultimately, the court ruled that Scarangella had not exhausted all reasonable means to retain counsel for the estate. While she may continue to represent herself in her personal FLA claim, the court ordered that the estate must be represented by a lawyer.

Recent articles & video

Understanding sustainable finance key for attracting global capital to Canada: Dentons partner

Supreme Court of Canada to hear three first degree murder cases next week

Ontario Court of Appeal dismisses motion to appeal interim vaccination order in child custody case

McCarthy Tétrault, Miller Thomson, Osler act in commercial list cases

BC Supreme Court cancels property transfer amid findings of abuse and coercion

Plaintiff cannot represent estate in medical negligence case without lawyer: Ontario Superior Court

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court refuses to remove estate trustees despite breach of fiduciary duties

Alberta Court of King's Bench orders sale of estate lands, ending 30-year dispute among heirs

Airlines must reimburse passengers according to federal regulations, SCC rules

BC lawyer admits to sexual misconduct, resigns from practice two weeks after announcing retirement