Commissioner of Official Languages urges court to interpret Act as intended

Raymond Théberge is co-appellant with francophone federation in case before Federal Court of Appeal

Commissioner of Official Languages urges court to interpret Act as intended

Raymond Théberge has expressed his hope that the Federal Court of Appeal will give Part VII of the Official Languages Act a meaning reflecting the legislators’ intent to improve the vitality of Canada’s English and French linguistic minority communities.

Théberge, as Commissioner of Official Languages of Canada, is a co-appellant with the Fédération des francophones de la Colombie-Britannique (FFCB) in the case against the federal government, for which hearings before the federal appellate court were held in person in Vancouver on Oct. 27 and 28.

A 2018 decision of the Federal Court restrictively interpreted the nature and scope of the duties under Part VII of the Official Languages Act, Théberge said in a statement, which consequently significantly weakened that part of the legislation and negatively affected the language rights of official language minority communities and the way his office can conduct its investigations. The decision was a clear setback for language rights, said the commissioner, who filed a notice of appeal in June.

Under section 41 (Part VII of the Official Languages Act), the Government of Canada is committed to enhancing the vitality of the English and French linguistic minority communities in Canada, supporting their development, and fostering the full recognition and use of both English and French in Canadian society.

Théberge said he has intensified his intercessions regarding the modernization of the Official Languages Act and recommended that the government “establish a regulatory framework that outlines how federal institutions are to carry out their duty to take positive measures.”

A backgrounder provided by the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages explained the context of the proceeding before the Federal Court of Appeal.

In 2011, the FFCB filed complaints before the commissioner of official languages, claiming that Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) and the Canada Employment Insurance Commission fell short of their obligations under the Official Languages Act to the French linguistic minority community when they entered into and implemented the 2008 Canada – British Columbia Labour Market Development Agreement.

The commissioner, upon investigating the matter, found an infringement of Part IV (Communications with and Services to the Public) and Part VII (Advancement of English and French) of the legislation. The commissioner determined that the employment centres launched by B.C. failed to offer service of equal quality in both official languages and that the ESDC and the Employment Insurance Commission failed to show that they had considered the impact of the agreement and of the new employment assistance service delivery model on the vitality of the French linguistic minority community.

In 2013, the FFCB sought orders from the Federal Court to direct the ESDC and the commission to take the steps needed to meet the requirements of Part VII under the agreement, as well as to comply with Part IV by ensuring that the new model offers employment benefits and support measures that are of equal quality for the French-speaking community.

In May 2018, the Federal Court dismissed the FFCB’s application, finding that the requirement to provide services in both official languages was not applicable to the agreement because B.C. was not acting on behalf of the ESDC or of the commission under the legislation. The court also ruled that the ESDC and the commission took adequate positive measures to comply with their obligations under Part VII.

Recent articles & video

Vote for Canadian Lawyer's Top Regional Ontario firms

Privacy and access authorities gather in Toronto to address emerging issues

Federal Court limits trademark to dining services, excludes sit-down and take-out offerings

Ontario Court of Appeal denies mother's bid to prevent child's return to Bangladesh

PEI Court of Appeal affirms property transfer to heir did not require subdivision approval

NS Court of Appeal affirms doctors' right to judicial review in dispute with health authority

Most Read Articles

Federal Court overturns study permit denial, citing unreasonable focus on applicant’s career plans

Ontario court rejects child protection agency’s ‘speculation and gossip’, orders child’s return

Pre-hearing request to review law firm's fees in personal injury case is premature: BC Supreme Court

SK Court of King’s Bench dismisses personal injury claim due to inordinate delay