A workflow to automate your deposition prep using HighQ

This simple workflow assigns preparation tasks to a paralegal whenever a deposition is scheduled in HighQ

A workflow to automate your deposition prep using HighQ

Sponsored content

Even simple legal processes include complexities. Think of a deposition and all its associated tasks. A lot of things need to go just right" for the process to move ahead successfully. And while a seasoned legal team may know the process by heart, automation can help streamline and simplify the work.

Automating deposition tasks with HighQ

Using HighQ, law firms can easily automate the many to-dos around deposition preparation. For example, a simple workflow can assign basic preparation tasks to a paralegal every time a deposition is scheduled in HighQ.

Your firm can build this process and customize it for your individual legal team members with just three steps. Once in place, your future depositions will be on track automatically. By following the process below, you can build it once and watch the work . . . flow.

Step 1 — Decide what triggers your automation

By navigating to the Rule Builder within HighQ, you'll want to create a specific task trigger. This is the if" statement in the classic if, then" of computer programming: If a thing happens, then take this action.

In the graphic below, you'll see a rule for a hypothetical firm, Armstrong Fischer. The rule runs when a user adds a record to the firm's Deposition Tracker and populates the firm's paralegal field.

This trigger is quite simple. By adding conditions, you can quickly create much more complex triggers according to your needs.

Step 2 — Create specific actions to match your firm's practices

With the if" out of the way, it's time for the then" — the actions you want HighQ to take once the trigger criteria are satisfied.

In this example, HighQ automatically creates a task with a title, description, and start and end dates. The task is then assigned to a specific person within the firm.

This example workflow also includes a few traditional to-dos associated with a deposition: confirming the date, time, and location; booking a conference room and court reporter; and preparing copies of exhibits for the event.

In the real world, other elements of this task could be customized. You might add variables like key dates, assignees, email addresses, or other descriptive data. It's all up to you and what your team needs to successfully execute their tasks.

Step 3 — Check your work and deploy your automated workflow

With the trigger defined and the actions assigned, it's time to test your work. In this case, you would create a deposition record and populate the paralegal field. That's all it should take to spur HighQ into action.

From there, verify that the expected actions occurred and that they're delivering what your team needs. Was a task generated for both the lawyer and the paralegal on the matter? Are all the details and to-dos present and accounted for? If so, congratulations, you've just built an automated deposition prep workflow.

Automation Pro Tip: When you test, pay close attention to the triggers defined in step one. Make sure you're giving the workflow everything it needs before judging the success of its output.

The simple 1-2-3 method of Trigger/Action/Test is a textbook example of how to build simple automations around everyday legal matters.

With a workflow like this, your law firm can move ahead with confidence that, on the day of the deposition, all the proper preparations are in place.

To see how Thomson Reuterslegal technology can help your firm, contact us for a free consultation.


Recent articles & video

SCC orders Ontario and Canada to negotiate with First Nation on unpaid Treaty annuities

Credit curtailment, consolidation among impacts of SCC’s Redwater decision for oil and gas: lawyers

Canadian consumer insolvencies at highest in almost five years

The BoC is cutting, but has its pivot come too late?

Proactive approach needed for ‘huge change’ coming to GAAR tax law: Dentons

Ontario Superior Court grants father parenting schedule despite abuse and substance use allegations

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court grants limited spousal support due to economic hardship in 21-year marriage

Alberta court allows arbitration award to be entered as judgment in matrimonial dispute

State can be liable for damages for passing unconstitutional laws that infringe Charter rights: SCC

Lawyer suing legal regulator for discrimination claims expert witness violated practice standards