Provision in offset agreement must be included in calculating long-term disability benefits: court

Interpretation of the disability plan must include surrounding circumstances like offset agreements

Provision in offset agreement must be included in calculating long-term disability benefits: court
Subsequent agreements must be construed together with the original agreement

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal has ruled that an offset agreement providing for a deduction for part-time income against long-term disability benefits must be included in the interpretation of the long-term disability plan.

In Nova Scotia Public Service Long Term Disability Trust Fund v. Baxendale, 2022 NSCA 6, Baxendale was injured in a motor vehicle accident. Three years after the accident, she worked part time while receiving benefits from the Long-Term Disability (LTD) Plan administered by the Nova Scotia Public Service Long Term Disability Trust Fund (Trustees). These benefits were reduced by 50 per cent of Baxendale’s part-time income. Years later, Baxendale received a settlement of $800,000 for her losses — $360,000 of which was characterized as “loss of future income.” 

Due to the subrogation provisions of the plan, Baxendale and the Trustees entered into an offset agreement where she could retain the $360,000 and her LTD benefits would be “reduced until such time as the $360,000, including an amortized rate of return on this sum, had been exhausted.  Thereafter, Ms. Baxendale would once again be entitled to long-term disability benefits.” Eventually, Baxendale was paid LTD benefits less the offset as well as a reduction for her part-time income.

Baxendale sued, claiming that the Trustees breached the offset agreement and asserted that she should receive the LTD benefits without deduction for part-time income. The judge agreed and awarded Baxendale “retroactive benefits.”

The Trustees appealed, alleging that both the offset agreement and the plan provided for offset of part-time income against LTD payments.

The appellate court agreed.

In failing to interpret the offset agreement, the judge failed to consider the surrounding circumstances which disclosed that the offset included a deduction for part-time income when calculating the LTD amounts payable, said the court. Thus, the appeal was allowed.

Recent articles & video

Vote for Canadian Lawyer's Top Regional Ontario firms

Privacy and access authorities gather in Toronto to address emerging issues

Federal Court limits trademark to dining services, excludes sit-down and take-out offerings

Ontario Court of Appeal denies mother's bid to prevent child's return to Bangladesh

PEI Court of Appeal affirms property transfer to heir did not require subdivision approval

NS Court of Appeal affirms doctors' right to judicial review in dispute with health authority

Most Read Articles

Federal Court overturns study permit denial, citing unreasonable focus on applicant’s career plans

Ontario court rejects child protection agency’s ‘speculation and gossip’, orders child’s return

Pre-hearing request to review law firm's fees in personal injury case is premature: BC Supreme Court

SK Court of King’s Bench dismisses personal injury claim due to inordinate delay