Ontario Court of Appeal upholds paramedics' convictions over death of shooting victim

The paramedics' belief about the superficiality was not reasonable given the circumstances

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds paramedics' convictions over death of shooting victim

The Ontario Court of Appeal has upheld the convictions of two paramedics, who were found guilty of failing to provide the necessaries of life to 19-year-old Yosif Al-Hasnawi.

The court found that the paramedics' misjudgment of the severity of Al-Hasnawi’s injuries led to his death after he was shot in the abdomen with a .22 calibre hollow-point bullet.

On the night of December 2, 2017, first responders were dispatched to a shooting incident. The paramedics arrived at the scene to find Al-Hasnawi lying on the sidewalk, surrounded by friends and family. Despite the urgency of the situation, the paramedics concluded that his wound was superficial and could have been caused by a pellet gun. Consequently, they failed to treat the wound as a penetrating injury and did not rush Al-Hasnawi to a trauma hospital.

The paramedics’ failure to follow protocols included inappropriately lifting Al-Hasnawi and delaying his transport to the hospital. They routed him to a psychiatric hospital instead of a trauma hospital. En route, Al-Hasnawi’s condition worsened, and he was declared dead shortly after arriving at the psychiatric facility.

The trial judge found that the paramedics' actions marked a departure from the expected standard of care. This conclusion was based on their failure to recognize the seriousness of Al-Hasnawi’s wound, their inappropriate handling of his body, and the delay in providing urgent medical care.

The paramedics appealed their convictions on several grounds, including claims of erroneous analytical approach by the trial judge, insufficient and contradictory reasons, and misapprehension of key evidence. The Crown also sought leave to appeal the sentences, arguing for custodial terms instead of the 18-month conditional sentences initially imposed.

The Court of Appeal dismissed both the paramedics' appeal against their convictions and the Crown's appeal for harsher sentences. The court ruled that the trial judge had considered all relevant evidence and appropriately determined the standard of care expected from the paramedics. The court also found that the paramedics' belief about the superficiality of the wound, even if honestly held, was not reasonable given the circumstances.

Expert testimonies played a significant role in the trial. Dr. Richard Verbeek, an expert in pre-hospital and emergency medicine, testified about the serious nature of penetrating abdominal wounds and the need for immediate transport to a trauma hospital. Other experts, including Dr. Elena Bulakhtina, who performed the autopsy, and Dr. Andrew Healy, who treated Al-Hasnawi at the psychiatric hospital, confirmed that his chances of survival were significantly higher if he had been taken to a trauma hospital.

Ultimately, the Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's decision to impose 18-month conditional sentences. The court noted that the trial judge had properly considered the principles of sentencing, including the need for general and specific deterrence and the significant moral blameworthiness of the paramedics.

Recent articles & video

Vote for Canadian Lawyer's Top Regional Ontario firms

Privacy and access authorities gather in Toronto to address emerging issues

Federal Court limits trademark to dining services, excludes sit-down and take-out offerings

Ontario Court of Appeal denies mother's bid to prevent child's return to Bangladesh

PEI Court of Appeal affirms property transfer to heir did not require subdivision approval

NS Court of Appeal affirms doctors' right to judicial review in dispute with health authority

Most Read Articles

Federal Court overturns study permit denial, citing unreasonable focus on applicant’s career plans

Ontario court rejects child protection agency’s ‘speculation and gossip’, orders child’s return

Pre-hearing request to review law firm's fees in personal injury case is premature: BC Supreme Court

SK Court of King’s Bench dismisses personal injury claim due to inordinate delay