Aird & Berlis, Dickinson Wright, Miller Thomson, Torkin Manes appear in commercial list suits
Aird & Berlis, Cassels, Cozen O'Connor, Dickinson Wright, Goodmans, McCarthy Tétrault, Miller Thomson, Morse Shannon, Stikeman Elliott, and Torkin Manes made appearances in numerous commercial list matters before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice this past week.
Aird & Berlis LLP appeared in two cases
Sanjeev Mitra, partner, represented applicant Royal Bank of Canada in Royal Bank of Canada v AHM Transport Inc. et al. He tackles matters involving commercial and consumer insolvency.
Jeremy Nemers, partner, advised applicant Royal Bank of Canada in Royal Bank of Canada v Right Drive Inc. He practises in the areas of insolvency and restructuring law.
Most Read
Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP appeared in two cases
Jane Dietrich, partner, acted for applicant Constantine Enterprises Inc. in the cases of Constantine Enterprises Inc. v Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc. et al and Constantine Enterprises Inc. v Sam M (180 Saw) LP Inc. et al. She belongs to the firm’s restructuring and insolvency group.
Cozen O'Connor Professional Corporation appeared in two cases
Steven Weisz, a member at the firm, represented Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc. and one other respondent in Constantine Enterprises Inc. v Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc. et al and advised Sam M (180 Saw) LP Inc. and one other respondent in Constantine Enterprises Inc. v Sam M (180 Saw) LP Inc. et al. He works on all aspects of complex domestic and multinational insolvencies.
Dickinson Wright LLP appeared in two cases
Lisa Corne, partner, acted for respondent Dickinson Wright PLLC in Pride Group Holdings Inc. v CWB Maximum Financial Inc et al. She is a commercial insolvency lawyer.
David Preger, partner, represented applicant Romspen Investment Corporation in Romspen Investment Corporation v Woodbine Mall Holdings Inc. et al. He focuses on real estate law and automotive workouts.
Goodmans LLP appeared in two cases
Robert Chadwick, partner, advised Xplore Inc. and one other applicant in Xplore Inc. et al v Telesat (IOM) Limited et al. He practises in the areas of corporate and commercial law, restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, banking, and private equity law.
Howard Wise, partner, acted for respondent Delgant (T.O.) Ltd. in Clarkson Road Developments GP Inc. et al v Dolente Concrete & Drain Company. He focuses on construction law and commercial litigation.
McCarthy Tétrault LLP appeared in two cases
Lance Williams, partner, represented respondent UBS AG in the Xplore case. He handles complex insolvency and corporate finance matters.
Saneea Tanvir, associate, advised Clarkson Road Developments GP Inc. and two other applicants in the Clarkson Road case. She works on bankruptcy, insolvency, restructuring, and commercial litigation matters.
Miller Thomson LLP appeared in two cases
Enzo Di Iorio, Vaughan managing partner, acted for A. Darolfi and eight other defendants in Tari v Darolfi et al. He has dealt with corporate and commercial matters.
Patryk Sawicki, associate, represented plaintiff Raysun Holding Limited in Raysun Holding Limited v W Garden Corporation et al. He is growing a business law practice focusing on insolvency and restructuring matters.
Morse Shannon LLP appeared in two cases
Jerome Morse, partner, advised respondent S. Mizrahi in the cases of Constantine Enterprises Inc. v Mizrahi (128 Hazelton) Inc. et al and Constantine Enterprises Inc. v Sam M (180 Saw) LP Inc. et al. His practice areas include civil litigation and personal injury law.
Stikeman Elliott LLP appeared in two cases
Alexander Rose, partner, acted for respondent Cradle Acquisition Corp. in Hamilton Thorne Ltd. v Cradle Acquisition Corp. He focuses on complex commercial litigation, including securities litigation.
Philip Yang, associate, represented applicant VBI Vaccines Inc. in VBI Vaccines Inc. He focuses on restructuring and insolvency matters.
Torkin Manes LLP appeared in two cases
Stewart Thom, partner, advised applicant Bank of Montreal in Bank of Montreal v Muskoka Beach Developments Inc. et al and acted for respondent 2121043 Ontario Inc in the Pride Group case. He focuses on security enforcement, insolvency litigation, and commercial litigation.
