With multiple infamous instances of law firm data breaches over the last few years, implementing security measures to protect electronically stored information has been a hot topic.
With multiple infamous instances of law firm data breaches over the last few years, implementing security measures to protect electronically stored information has been a hot topic.
Recent government action reiterates the importance of robust data protection. The federal government recently proposed the Breach of Security Safeguards Regulations, which would trigger the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act's mandatory notice and record-keeping requirements. Though consequences of contravening PIPEDA can be severe, small firms are not excluded from obligations imposed under the legislation.
PIPEDA
PIPEDA applies to the collection, use or disclosure of personal information by every organization in the course of a commercial activity. It attempts to balance privacy rights of individuals with the needs of businesses to use or share information.
While PIPEDA has been around since 2000, reporting data breaches has been voluntary up until the passing of the Digital Privacy Act in 2015. In fact, in response to recommendations in 2006 to create a system of breach notification, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner took the position that it should be up to the breached organization to voluntarily notify affected individuals and the privacy commissioner. In 2011, the second five-year review of PIPEDA again recommended mandatory notification obligations to no avail. The Digital Privacy Act finally succeeded in incorporating into PIPEDA mandatory notice and record-keeping requirements for data breaches.
The provisions of PIPEDA to come into force include the following procedures in the event of a data breach:
These provisions will come into effect when regulations outlining specific requirements are passed. The federal government has proposed such regulations — the proposed Breach of Security Safeguard Regulations, which outline the content, form and manner of reporting and record-keeping for each instance of a breach of security safeguards. PIPEDA defines breach of security safeguards as "the loss of, unauthorized access to or unauthorized disclosure of personal information resulting from a breach of an organization’s security safeguards . . . or from a failure to establish those safeguards."
The impact on small firms and their clients is potentially substantial. Contravention of PIPEDA results in fines of up to $10,000 for a summary offence and up to $100,000 for an indictable offence.
Updating law firm security measures
Given that law firms are in a particularly vulnerable position due to the vast amount of sensitive information they hold and the outdated or lax security measures taken by many lawyers, the proposed regulations should be a final wake-up call to revisit security measures to ensure that they properly protect personal information.
Some common and cost-effective measures that small firms can take include:
The mandatory reporting requirements and associated regulations have not come into force yet, though they will be a fact sooner rather than later. As such, now is a great opportunity for your firm to audit its security measures, as well as update policies and procedures to comply with upcoming legislative changes.