US judge denies rapper Pras Michel's request for new trial despite AI error in closing argument

During the trial, Michel's legal group employed an AI tool to help draft closing arguments

US judge denies rapper Pras Michel's request for new trial despite AI error in closing argument

A federal judge has rejected American rapper Prakazrel "Pras" Michel's request for a new trial despite an error made by an artificial intelligence (AI) program used in crafting closing arguments.

Michel, a member of the hip-hop group Fugees, had been convicted for using straw donors in a covert lobbying campaign related to foreign lobbying and witness tampering, the ABA Journal reported.

Senior US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the District of Columbia upheld the conviction. Michel was found guilty of participating in a scheme to persuade the US government to drop charges against a fugitive financier connected to Malaysia's 1MDB sovereign wealth fund collapse.

During the trial, Michel's legal team employed an AI tool created by EyeLevel.AI to help draft closing arguments. The AI-generated closing mistakenly attributed lyrics from rapper Puff Daddy (now known as Diddy) to Michel's group, the Fugees. Despite this mix-up, the judge ruled that the error did not significantly impact the case’s outcome. Michel’s lawyer repeated the erroneous lyrics in his closing argument, but the court found no prejudice to the defendant.

Judge Kollar-Kotelly ruled that Michel had not demonstrated ineffective assistance of counsel, stating that Michel failed to show that his legal team's use of the AI program led to an unfair trial or that it would have altered the verdict.

Michel’s legal team had used the AI program to generate a closing argument that incorrectly cited Diddy's lyrics from "I’ll Be Missing You" instead of a song by the Fugees. The court determined that using incorrect lyrics did not undermine Michel’s defence.

The case also raised concerns over an undisclosed financial conflict of interest involving Michel’s lawyers and their relationship with CaseFile Connect, a partner of the AI tool’s developers. However, the court found no improper financial involvement, concluding that Michel's attorneys had no direct financial stake in EyeLevel.AI.

Recent articles & video

Recent decisions confirm presumptive prejudgment interest rate for non-pecuniary damages

Register now for table and tickets to the 2024 Lexpert Rising Stars Awards

SCC says witness statement should not have been admitted in criminal case, orders new trial

Nearly half of voters at heated LSBC meeting vote to amend Indigenous intercultural course

The CBA’s new president Lynne Vicars on reinforcing public trust in Canada's justice system

Ontario Court of Appeal enforces two-year limitation for estate claims in unjust enrichment dispute

Most Read Articles

Ontario Superior Court dismisses lawsuit against health institutions over unpaid court-ordered costs

Ontario Court of Appeal enforces two-year limitation for estate claims in unjust enrichment dispute

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds convictions for conservation violations on a farm property

Future support payments must rely on financial disclosures, not past tax returns: BC Court of Appeal