Delaware Supreme Court allows limited use of AI for judges and court staff under new policy

Staff are prohibited from delegating their decision-making responsibilities to AI

Delaware Supreme Court allows limited use of AI for judges and court staff under new policy

The Delaware Supreme Court announced an interim policy allowing judges and court staff to use artificial intelligence (AI) in their work, but with specific limitations to ensure its responsible use.

Reuters reported that the new guidelines come as part of an effort to address the rapid evolution of generative AI technology while maintaining judicial integrity and accuracy.

Under the interim policy, judicial officers and court personnel in Delaware must exercise caution when using generative AI tools and are accountable for the accuracy of their work. The court’s administrative arm must approve any AI tools used in official duties. Additionally, individuals must receive training on these tools before incorporating them into their work processes, and they are expressly prohibited from delegating their decision-making responsibilities to AI.

Delaware Supreme Court Justice Karen Valihura, co-chair of the Delaware Commission on Law and Technology, emphasized the balance between potential benefits and risks associated with generative AI. “Like other technologies, there are possible benefits of using generative AI, but there are potential pitfalls and dangers associated with it, and we believe this interim policy provides our judges and employees some needed and appropriate guardrails,” Valihura said in a statement.

The Delaware Commission on Law and Technology, which focuses on the impact of developing technologies on the legal field, reviewed and approved the policy. The interim policy's brevity reflects the court's awareness of the rapidly changing landscape of AI tools and aims to adapt as technology evolves.

The policy also includes guidelines to protect sensitive information. It mandates that users must not input non-public information into unapproved AI tools and prohibits using unapproved AI on state technology resources. This measure is intended to safeguard confidential court data and uphold the integrity of court proceedings.

The Delaware Supreme Court’s announcement comes as courts, law firms, and corporate legal teams across the country explore emerging AI tools in legal work. In a parallel move, the Georgia Supreme Court established a committee to study AI's impact on the judiciary, following similar initiatives by other state and federal courts.

Recent articles & video

Federation of Law Societies of Canada highlights mental health challenges in the legal profession

Pre-hearing request to review law firm's fees in personal injury case is premature: BC Supreme Court

Nova Scotia Barristers' Society releases racial equity survey report

Ontario Court of Appeal upholds privacy protection in murder case involving teenagers

PEI Supreme Court upholds restrictions on doctor's license but allows limited virtual care

UK law firms warn of exit from new legal aid contracts without fee hike

Most Read Articles

BC Supreme Court mandates DNA test to determine plaintiff’s claim in will dispute

CIBC did not discriminate against ex-employee based on his disability and heterosexuality, FCA rules

Federal Court overturns study permit denial, citing unreasonable focus on applicant’s career plans

Ontario court rejects child protection agency’s ‘speculation and gossip’, orders child’s return