Theatre Network v CSIC Services
Theatre Network Society
Law Firm / Organization
Emery Jamieson LLP
Lawyer(s)

Grayson Bateyko

CSIC Services & Holding Ltd
Law Firm / Organization
Kennedy Agrios Oshry Law
Lawyer(s)

Janice A. Agrios

Facts:

  • Theatre Network Society (TN) sought a Summary Judgment Application for an easement of necessity over CSIC Services & Holding Ltd.’s (CSIC) property to complete the south exterior wall of the Roxy Theatre, which was being reconstructed after a fire.
  • The remaining construction work included removal of formwork, waterproofing, insulation, and cladding installation.
  • TN claimed it could not complete the work without accessing CSIC’s land at grade level, roof level, and airspace above.
  • CSIC cross-applied for Summary Dismissal of TN’s claim.

Legal Findings:

  • An easement of necessity requires absolute necessity, not mere inconvenience (Nelson v 1153696 Alberta Ltd., 2011 ABCA 203).
  • Necessity cannot be self-created (Condominium Plan No. 7810477 v Condominium Plan No. 7711723, 1997 CanLII 14869).
  • TN had alternative access from 124 Street (east) and a rear lane (west).
  • The building’s design created the need for access, despite TN knowing CSIC had not granted consent.
  • The theatre had been operational for years, and no structural issues were found in a 2023 engineer’s report.
  • The City of Edmonton had issued an occupancy certificate, refuting serious safety concerns.

Decision:

  • TN’s claim was dismissed; CSIC’s Summary Dismissal was granted.
  • Costs awarded to CSIC for both applications. Exact amount was nbot specified.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2103 17690
Real estate
Defendant