Stern v. Moeinifar
SAMUEL STERN
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Paul Gribilas

MEHRAN MOEINIFAR
Law Firm / Organization
Manis Law Inc.

Overview

  • The Plaintiff, Samuel Stern, sought summary judgment for an unpaid $1,000,000 loan, plus 8% interest from January 15, 2018.
  • The Defendant, Mehran Moeinifar, personally guaranteed the loan, secured by a third mortgage on an Ontario property and a collateral mortgage on a Florida property.
  • The court granted judgment for $1,445,673.52 (including interest as of March 31, 2023) with pre- and post-judgment interest at 8%.

Key Issues & Findings

  1. Jurisdiction Challenge:

    • The Defendant argued Ontario lacked jurisdiction due to a Florida law clause in the collateral mortgage.
    • The court rejected this, ruling that:
      • The Defendant attorned to Ontario’s jurisdiction by filing a defense without raising jurisdiction.
      • The loan agreement and guarantee were governed by Ontario law.
      • The Florida law clause applied only to the collateral mortgage.
  2. Forum Non Conveniens:

    • The Defendant claimed Florida was a more appropriate forum.
    • The court found this argument untimely and unsubstantiated, as:
      • No motion to stay proceedings was ever filed.
      • The loan, guarantee, and borrowers were Ontario-based.

Final Decision

  • The Defendant was liable as a principal debtor, not a mere surety.
  • No payments were made after February 2018, and enforcement in Florida was complicated by a promissory note issue.
  • The Plaintiff obtained an order lifting the bankruptcy stay and successfully pursued judgment in Ontario.
  • The court found no genuine issue for trial and ruled in the Plaintiff’s favor.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00679926
Real estate
$ 1,445,674
Plaintiff