Eddy Ng Management Services Ltd. v Golden Spigot Pub Ltd.
Golden Spigot Pub Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Six Mile Pub Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
David Wong
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Fancy Ching
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Prime Concepts Management Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Raffles ’78 Enterprises Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Marisa Manzini
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Gundyco in trust for Bonnie Jay
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Gundyco in trust for Alfred Wong
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Gundyco in trust for Daphne Law
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Bonnie Jay and Gillian Graeme
Law Firm / Organization
Miller Titerle + Company
Eddy Ng Management Services Ltd.
Ling Zhu Ng on her own behalf, in her capacity as the administrator of the estate of Eddy Ng, and in her capacity as the executor of the estate of Wei Ying Lee
Betty Ng
Vincent Ng
Maria Tapp

Background:
Eddy Ng Management Services Ltd. (ENMS) and other petitioners held a minority stake in Golden Spigot Pub Ltd. (Golden Spigot), which owned Six Mile Pub Ltd. (Six Mile). The petitioners sought a court order to liquidate Golden Spigot, citing oppression under s. 227 of the Business Corporations Act (BCA) and claiming unfair treatment by the majority shareholders, David Wong and Fanny Ching.

Legal Issues & Arguments:

  • The petitioners alleged oppression under s. 227 of the BCA, claiming they were excluded from financial decisions and not given fair value for their shares.
  • They argued that Golden Spigot failed to pay dividends or offer transparency, violating their reasonable expectations.
  • The respondents countered that the company always operated informally, and no oppression occurred.
  • The petitioners also sought liquidation under s. 324 of the BCA, arguing the company functioned as a partnership that had broken down.

Court’s Decision & Award:

  • The court dismissed the oppression claim, finding no unfair treatment.
  • However, it granted liquidation under s. 324, ruling that Golden Spigot operated as a partnership and had irreparably broken down.
  • C.E. Craig & Associates was appointed liquidator.
  • The liquidation order was suspended for 90 days to allow negotiations.
  • The decision did not specify an award of costs.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
247395
Corporate & commercial law
Petitioner