Geoghegan v. Alarie
MARK J. GEOGHEGAN
Law Firm / Organization
Templeman LLP
629692 BC LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Templeman LLP
KELLY ALARIE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Martin Diegel

GILLES ALARIE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Martin Diegel

CAROL GEOGHEGAN
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Martin Diegel

Background & Claims

  • BC Ltd. owned a one-third interest in property at 1397 Anderson Road, Sharbot Lake, Ontario, but was dissolved in 2007.
  • Mark Geoghegan, sole shareholder, claimed he was unaware of the dissolution until 2020 and was restoring the company.
  • Kelly Alarie applied to have BC Ltd.’s forfeited interest transferred to her, without informing Mark.
  • Diegel’s law firm represented Alarie in this application; plaintiffs alleged the firm misrepresented ownership to the government.
  • Plaintiffs sought removal of Martin Diegel as defense counsel, arguing:
    1. He was a necessary witness regarding the application process.
    2. A conflict existed between defendants, as Carol Geoghegan’s actions could lead to crossclaims.

Court’s Analysis & Ruling

  • Lawyer as Witness:

    • The court found Diegel’s evidence was not crucial, as Jacob-Charles Diegel (not Martin Diegel) handled the application.
    • Solicitor-client privilege remained intact, limiting admissible testimony.
    • Trial judge could later decide if Diegel should testify, but disqualification was premature.
  • Conflict of Interest:

    • No present legal conflict between defendants; crossclaims were speculative.
    • Plaintiffs lacked standing to argue on behalf of defendants regarding conflicts.

Outcome

  • Motion Dismissed; Diegel remains as counsel.
  • Plaintiffs must pay $9,900 in costs.
  • Plaintiffs may reapply if new evidence emerges.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00000024-0000
Corporate & commercial law
$ 9,900
Defendant