Cabin Ridge Project Limited v Alberta
Cabin Ridge Project Limited
Cabin Ridge Holdings Limited
Atrum Coal Limited
Elan Coal Limited
Black Eagle Mining Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Bennett Jones LLP
Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Bennett Jones LLP
His Majesty the King in Right of Alberta
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
His Majesty the King in Right of Alberta as Represented by the Minister of Energy
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Case Overview

  • Appellants: Cabin Ridge Project Limited, Cabin Ridge Holdings Limited, Atrum Coal Limited, Elan Coal Limited, Black Eagle Mining Corporation, Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd.
  • Respondents: His Majesty the King in Right of Alberta, represented by the Minister of Energy
  • Issue: Whether government actions constituted constructive taking of the appellants’ coal interests, warranting compensation.

Background

  • The 1976 Coal Policy classified lands and regulated mining. In 2020, Alberta rescinded it to encourage investment.
  • In 2021, after public opposition, the government reinstated the policy and suspended new coal exploration on Category 2 lands.
  • The appellants argue these decisions eliminated reasonable uses of their property, effectively expropriating it.

Procedural History & Appeal Decision

  • The appellants sought to compel questioning of former Minister Sonya Savage and Minister Jason Nixon regarding policy decisions.
  • The case management judge denied the request, ruling the documentary record was sufficient.
  • The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part:
    • Found the Leeds Test was misapplied by relying on documents instead of assessing if the ministers were best informed.
    • Ordered former Minister Savage to testify, as she was directly involved in policy decisions relevant to the case.
    • Denied questioning of Minister Nixon, finding no overriding evidence of his key involvement.

Outcome

  • Former Minister Savage must testify; Minister Nixon is not required.
  • The case proceeds with further discovery on the appellants’ expropriation claims.
  • No monetary award specified.
Court of Appeal of Alberta
2401-0125AC; 2401-0126AC
Civil litigation
Appellant