18 Feb 2025
Cabin Ridge Project Limited v Alberta
Case Overview
- Appellants: Cabin Ridge Project Limited, Cabin Ridge Holdings Limited, Atrum Coal Limited, Elan Coal Limited, Black Eagle Mining Corporation, Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd.
- Respondents: His Majesty the King in Right of Alberta, represented by the Minister of Energy
- Issue: Whether government actions constituted constructive taking of the appellants’ coal interests, warranting compensation.
Background
- The 1976 Coal Policy classified lands and regulated mining. In 2020, Alberta rescinded it to encourage investment.
- In 2021, after public opposition, the government reinstated the policy and suspended new coal exploration on Category 2 lands.
- The appellants argue these decisions eliminated reasonable uses of their property, effectively expropriating it.
Procedural History & Appeal Decision
- The appellants sought to compel questioning of former Minister Sonya Savage and Minister Jason Nixon regarding policy decisions.
- The case management judge denied the request, ruling the documentary record was sufficient.
- The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part:
- Found the Leeds Test was misapplied by relying on documents instead of assessing if the ministers were best informed.
- Ordered former Minister Savage to testify, as she was directly involved in policy decisions relevant to the case.
- Denied questioning of Minister Nixon, finding no overriding evidence of his key involvement.
Outcome
- Former Minister Savage must testify; Minister Nixon is not required.
- The case proceeds with further discovery on the appellants’ expropriation claims.
- No monetary award specified.