Pushie v. Guidarelli
JAMES PUSHIE
Law Firm / Organization
Presvelos Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Sam A. Presvelos

CARMELA GUIDARELLI
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

P. Cote

Background

  • Parties: James Pushie (Plaintiff) and Carmela Guidarelli (Defendant).
  • Dispute: Ownership interest in 54 Gertrude Street, Hamilton, purchased in 2013 while the parties were in a romantic relationship.
  • Plaintiff’s Claim: Constructive/resulting trust based on mortgage payments, financial contributions, and renovations, seeking a share in the property’s appreciation or sale.
  • Defendant’s Position: Denies plaintiff’s financial contributions, maintains sole possession, and claims his funds were not an investment.

Procedural History

  • 2016: Case filed as an application.
  • 2021: Dismissed without oral evidence by Skarica J.
  • 2022: Divisional Court (Emery J.) overturned the dismissal, ordered a full trial with affidavits treated as pleadings and prior cross-examinations as discovery.
  • 2023-2024: Delays due to scheduling, lack of judges, and counsel availability.

Key Issues & Court Rulings

  1. Admissibility of Evidence

    • Plaintiff’s May 17, 2021 affidavit was previously ruled inadmissible but may be introduced at trial subject to relevance and admissibility determined by the trial judge.
    • Parties have ongoing disclosure obligations under Rule 30.02.
  2. Privilege & Settlement Communications

    • Alleged privileged text messages and solicitor-client communications will be assessed at trial.
  3. Amendment of Pleadings

    • Plaintiff’s amendments clarify claims and add an alternative damages claim.
    • Defendant’s objection based on prejudice was dismissed as no significant prejudice was proven.

Court Orders

  • Defendant must disclose documents within 30 days; discovery to be completed in 90 days.
  • Expert reports permitted (deadlines set).
  • Trial judge will rule on admissibility of evidence and privilege claims.
  • Plaintiff granted leave to amend pleadings.

Costs

  • No damages or final monetary awards were granted in this decision.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-16-58234
Real estate
Plaintiff