OSC v. Cacoeli Asset Management Inc. et al.
ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION
Law Firm / Organization
Ontario Securities Commission
Lawyer(s)

Hansen Wong

CACOELI ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI CAPITAL INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI DUKE WELLINGTON LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI LINNWOOD-LOWTHER LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI HEIMAN LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI ARLINGTON RENTAL LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI HOLBORN-CHICOPEE LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
HOLBORN CHICOPEE LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI BLOOR OSSINGTON LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI YS HIGH YIELD FINANCE LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI KENNEDY STEELES LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI FIXED INCOME FUND LP
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
11530704 CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI GP INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
10138851 CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
11089480 CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
HOLBORN CHICOPEE GP INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
CACOELI REAL ESTATE OPP GP INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
11889702 CANADA INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
2778754 ONTARIO LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Adair Goldblatt Bieber LLP
Terra Bona
Law Firm / Organization
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Ty Ullmann

John/Jane Doe
Law Firm / Organization
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Ty Ullmann

Grant Thornton Limited in its capacity as the Monitor for the Respondent
Law Firm / Organization
Aird & Berlis LLP

Key Findings:

  • OSC’s Application: The OSC sought the appointment of a receiver over the Respondents under section 129 of the Securities Act. Grant Thornton LLP was appointed as interim monitor.

  • Non-Disclosure & Evidence Disclosure:

    • Sections 16 and 17 of the Act impose confidentiality on section 11 investigation materials.
    • The OSC’s evidence included an affidavit referencing a section 11 order and interview transcripts but did not attach them.
    • The Respondents requested these documents, which the OSC provided under confidentiality restrictions.
  • Court-Approved Disclosure Protocol:

    • The OSC will file an affidavit attaching the section 11 order and transcripts.
    • A redacted version will be public, while an unredacted version will go to the court.
    • Any referenced excerpts in court proceedings will lose confidentiality.
  • Adjournment of Hearing:

    • The March 24, 2025, hearing was postponed to April 22, 2025 due to evidentiary and scheduling issues.
    • The interim monitor remains in place.
  • Unresolved Issues: The court did not rule on potential sealing orders or the use of compelled evidence from third-party witnesses.

  • Successful Party:

    • The court did not make a final ruling on the merits of the case.
  • No monetary award, costs, or damages were granted or ordered in this decision.

Next Steps:

The Application will proceed on April 22, 2025.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-25-00736396-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
05 February 2025