Simpson Oil Ltd. v. Parkland Corp.
SIMPSON OIL LIMITED
PARKLAND CORPORATION

Key Issue

  • Simpson Oil Limited (SOL) sought a ruling on whether changes in Parkland’s senior management triggered a Material Adverse Change (MAC) clause in the Governance Agreement, thereby lifting restrictions on its rights regarding Parkland shares.
  • The dispute centered on whether specific events listed in the MAC definition were automatic triggers or merely illustrative.

Background

  • In 2019, SOL sold 75% of Sol Investments Limited (SIL) to Parkland, later selling the remaining 25% in 2022. In return, SOL received shares, making it Parkland’s largest shareholder.
  • The Governance Agreement restricted SOL’s ability to vote its shares or acquire more, unless a MAC occurred.
  • The MAC definition stated it "shall include":
    1. A replacement of a majority of Parkland’s board within three months.
    2. A material change in senior management (excluding title changes).
  • SOL argued that the resignation of its CFO and 8 out of 10 senior executives constituted a MAC.

Court’s Decision

  • The court ruled that MAC events in the agreement were mandatory triggers, requiring no additional proof of financial harm.
  • The significant turnover in senior management met the definition of a MAC.
  • Result: The restrictions on SOL’s voting rights and acquisitions were lifted.

Key Takeaways

  • Clear contract language prevails; investor restrictions can be lifted upon predefined MAC events.
  • MAC clauses in governance agreements are rare, but courts will enforce them if explicitly drafted.
  • No specific monetary damages were awarded.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-728657-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
Applicant