Zaldin v. Goldstein et al.
Michelle Goldstein Zaldin
Seymour Goldstein aka Sonny Goldstein
Law Firm / Organization
Goldblatt Partners LLP
Sonny Goldstein Annuity and Insurance Agencies Inc. c.o.b. as Goldstein Financial Consultants
Law Firm / Organization
Goldblatt Partners LLP
Goldstein Financial Investments Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Goldblatt Partners LLP

Background:

  • Michelle Goldstein Zaldin (applicant) and her father, Seymour Goldstein (respondent), co-owned SGA&I, an insurance agency (90% Goldstein, 10% Zaldin). SGA&I fully owns GFII, a mutual fund dealer.
  • Their relationship deteriorated, leading to litigation. In January 2024, Mr. Goldstein terminated Ms. Zaldin’s employment.
  • In August 2024, Mr. Goldstein invoked the shotgun clause in a 2006 shareholders’ agreement, offering to sell his shares at $17,007 per share ($7.5M total).
  • Ms. Zaldin accepted in writing but later alleged that Mr. Goldstein’s failure to obtain regulatory approvals prevented her from securing financing.

Court’s Findings:

  1. Binding Agreement: A valid contract was formed when Ms. Zaldin accepted Mr. Goldstein’s offer.
  2. Breach of Contract: Mr. Goldstein breached the agreement by failing to obtain regulatory approvals for the ownership transfer of GFII. This failure directly impacted Ms. Zaldin’s ability to secure financing.
  3. Specific Performance: Awarded to Ms. Zaldin. The court rejected Mr. Goldstein’s claim under the reverse shotgun clause, citing his failure to fulfill contractual obligations.
  4. No Implied Terms: The court denied Ms. Zaldin’s request for price adjustments, an extended closing date, and additional resignation conditions.

Orders & Costs:

  • Ms. Zaldin must complete the purchase within 30 business days.
  • Mr. Goldstein’s application is dismissed.
  • Costs: Mr. Goldstein must pay $54,000 to Ms. Zaldin.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00730369-0000; CV-24-000731461-0000
Corporate & commercial law
$ 54,000
Applicant