Lam v WS Scott Station Development Limited Partnership
Lai Lin Lam
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

Faye Young Holding Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

Yuan Lian Holdings Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

Life Intelligence Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

Xiaoshan Ming
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

Kingston Jin Heng Huang
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

Tommy Mo
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

TPNB Enterprise Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Direction Legal LLP
Lawyer(s)

David Sue-A-Quan

WS Scott Station Development Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

Brian Keith Regehr
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

1095355 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

WS Lower Twelfth Development Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

WS Lower Twelfth GP Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

WS NW Phase 1 Nominee Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

Urban Village Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

0864917 B.C. Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

West Village Parcel 6 Holdings Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

West Village Parcel 7 Holdings Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

West Village Parcel 8 Holdings Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
McMillan LLP
Lawyer(s)

Daniel Shouldice

Overview:
The Supreme Court of British Columbia heard two consolidated actions where the plaintiffs, Lai Lin Lam, Faye Young Holding Ltd., Yuan Lian Holdings Ltd., Life Intelligence Ltd., Xiaoshan Ming, Kingston Jin Heng Huang, Tommy Mo, and TPNB Enterprise Ltd., sought to maintain Certificates of Pending Litigation (CPLs) on properties in New Westminster, BC. The defendants, WS Scott Station Development Limited Partnership, Brian Keith Regehr, 1095355 B.C. Ltd., WS Lower Twelfth Development Limited Partnership, WS Lower Twelfth GP Ltd., WS NW Phase 1 Nominee Ltd., Urban Village Limited Partnership, 0864917 B.C. Ltd., West Village Parcel 6 Holdings Ltd., West Village Parcel 7 Holdings Ltd., and West Village Parcel 8 Holdings Ltd., applied to cancel the CPLs.

Legal Issues:

  • The plaintiffs alleged that funds from the sale of a Surrey development were improperly diverted, entitling them to a constructive trust over the properties.

  • The court assessed whether their claims met the requirements of Section 215 of the Land Title Act (LTA) to justify the CPLs.

  • The defendants argued that the plaintiffs lacked a direct proprietary interest and should have brought a derivative claim.

Court's Decision & Costs:
The court ruled that the plaintiffs’ pleadings failed to establish a valid claim to an interest in land. The CPLs were immediately cancelled. The defendants were awarded costs of the applications in the cause (specific amounts were not stated).

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S240607
Real estate
Defendant