2512322 Ontario Ltd. v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No.
2512322 ONTARIO LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Glaholt Bowles LLP
TORONTO STANDARD CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION NO. 2255
Law Firm / Organization
Lash Condo Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jonathan Fine

MOSHIN MUHAMMED
Law Firm / Organization
Lash Condo Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jonathan Fine

NAFEES BACCHUS
Law Firm / Organization
Lash Condo Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jonathan Fine

RAJ SHARMA
Law Firm / Organization
Lash Condo Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jonathan Fine

DUKA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Lash Condo Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jonathan Fine

Case Overview:

  • Parties Involved:

    • Plaintiff: 2512322 Ontario Ltd., owner of Unit 1 in a commercial condominium managed by Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2255 (TSCC 2255).
    • Defendants: TSCC 2255, its board members, and Duka Property Management Inc.
  • Nature of the Dispute:

    • The plaintiff withheld common expense payments since 2019, citing grievances against TSCC 2255, including:
      • Lack of financial information and meeting notices.
      • Failure to maintain and repair common elements.
      • Misallocation of water charges to the plaintiff’s unit.
    • TSCC 2255 sought partial summary judgment to dismiss certain claims in the plaintiff’s statement of claim.

Key Legal Issue:

  • Whether the plaintiff could withhold payment of common expenses due to disputes with TSCC 2255.

Court’s Decision:

  • Justice Koehnen ruled in favor of TSCC 2255, granting partial summary judgment and dismissing the claims that sought to avoid common expense payments.
  • The court held that:
    • Section 84(3)(b) of the Condominium Act, 1998 unequivocally prohibits withholding common expense payments, even when an owner has claims against the condominium corporation.
    • Public policy supports this interpretation to ensure consistent funding for the corporation’s operations.

Additional Findings:

  • The plaintiff failed to provide evidence of actual financial losses due to the alleged overcharge of water fees.
  • The court rejected the argument that the plaintiff’s disputes justified withholding payments.
  • Summary judgment was appropriate since the central issue was a matter of law, not fact.

Costs:

  • TSCC 2255 was awarded $23,772 in costs, payable by the plaintiff within 30 days.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-21-00660918
Real estate
$ 23,772
Defendant