Convocation Flowers Incorporated v. Anisa Holdings Ltd.
CONVOCATION FLOWERS INCORPORATED
Law Firm / Organization
Levy Zavet Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Julian Binavince

ANISA HOLDINGS LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Whelton Hiutin LLP
ANTONIO ALMEIDA
Law Firm / Organization
Whelton Hiutin LLP
ISABEL ALMEIDA
Law Firm / Organization
Whelton Hiutin LLP
CHRIS LINHARES
Law Firm / Organization
Whelton Hiutin LLP

Background:

  • The dispute arose over a commercial lease. Convocation Flowers (the "Tenant") operated a flower warehousing business in a unit leased since 2018.
  • The property was purchased in 2023 by Anisa Holdings Ltd. (the "New Landlord"), which sought to use the building for its carpentry business.
  • The New Landlord attempted to terminate leases with tenants, including the Tenant. When negotiations failed, it removed access to loading docks and driveways critical to the Tenant's operations.

Key Issues and Rulings:

  1. Fundamental Breach of Lease:

    • The New Landlord’s actions (blocking access to the loading docks and the Enlarged Door Improvement negotiated in the lease) fundamentally breached and repudiated the lease.
    • The court held that the alterations rendered the Tenant unable to use the premises for its intended purpose (efficient flower storage and distribution).
  2. Breach of Duty of Good Faith:

    • The New Landlord violated its duty of good faith by exercising discretionary powers under the lease to serve its own interests, not those of the Tenant.
    • The court inferred that the New Landlord acted to force the Tenant out, disregarding their legitimate contractual interests.
  3. Constructive Eviction:

    • The changes were severe enough to amount to constructive eviction, allowing the Tenant to vacate and treat the lease as terminated.
  4. Damages:

    • The court ordered a trial to determine damages, focusing on costs incurred by the Tenant to relocate and higher rents at its new premises.

Decision:

  • The court declared the New Landlord in breach, both fundamentally and in bad faith. Damages would be assessed separately. The exact monetary damages were not determined in this judgment.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00689587
Corporate & commercial law
Applicant