NOVA Chemicals v Dow Chemical Canada
NOVA Chemicals Corporation

Case Context:

  • Nature: Complex, long-standing litigation involving multiple trial phases and appeals.
  • Current Appeal: NOVA seeks relief related to procedural and pre-trial decisions for the Pool Remand phase of the trial.

Key Issues and Decisions:

  1. Permission to Appeal:

    • Grounds A & B (Misinterpretation and unfair processes): Permission not required; appeals can proceed as of right.
    • Ground C (Pre-trial timing and fairness issues): Permission required but denied due to:
      • Lack of a significant legal question of general importance.
      • Low likelihood of success.
      • Risk of undue prejudice to the trial's progress without proportional benefit.
  2. Stay of Proceedings:

    • NOVA sought to halt the Pool Remand trial pending appeal, arguing unfair discovery processes would cause irreparable harm.
    • Denied based on:
      • Insufficient evidence of irreparable harm (e.g., financial harm was compensable).
      • Balance of convenience favoring continuation of trial.
      • Appellate courts generally defer to trial judges' discretion in managing proceedings.
  3. Expedited Appeals:

    • Request for expedited handling denied to avoid procedural burdens and conflicting judgments.
  4. Procedural Matters:

    • Other procedural requests were adjourned without resolution.
  5. Costs:

    • Costs awarded to Dow as the largely successful party. Specific amount not provided.

Conclusion:

  • Appeals on Grounds A and B allowed to proceed.
  • Appeal on Ground C dismissed.
  • Trial proceedings to continue without delay.
Court of Appeal of Alberta
2401-0152AC; 2401-0191AC; 2401-0075AC
Corporate & commercial law
Respondent