Diamant Cleaning Vancouver Inc. v Kindred Construction Ltd.
Diamant Cleaning Vancouver Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Kindred Construction Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Burrard Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

David K. Plunkett

Ouran Li
Law Firm / Organization
Webster Hudson & Coombe LLP (WHC Law)
Lawyer(s)

Leah Seneviratne

Background:
Diamant Cleaning Vancouver Inc. (plaintiff) entered into a cleaning contract with Kindred Construction Ltd. (defendant). A dispute arose regarding the contract amount, leading the plaintiff to file a builder’s lien. Kindred paid funds into court to remove the lien. A prior summary trial dismissed the plaintiff’s claim, awarding costs to Kindred. The plaintiff appealed but later settled, withdrawing the appeal in exchange for a waiver of Kindred’s costs and a $1 payment.

Legal Issues & Arguments:

  • The plaintiff claimed Kindred misrepresented the governing contract and sought to set aside the settlement agreement.

  • The plaintiff alleged collusion between her lawyer, Ouran Li (third party), and Kindred in drafting the release. The court rejected this claim, finding it a standard legal practice.

  • Kindred argued the settlement was valid since it was negotiated by counsel with ostensible authority.

  • The plaintiff claimed she did not authorize her lawyer to settle. The court found the release binding against Kindred but allowed her to continue the case against Mr. Li.

Judgment & Costs:

  • The court dismissed the claim against Kindred, ruling the settlement and release were valid.

  • The plaintiff was ordered to pay all litigation costs incurred by Kindred, including prior hearings and trial preparation. The exact amount was to be determined.

  • The claim against Ouran Li remained unresolved, pending further proceedings.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S241701
Construction law
Defendant