Rayner v Dhaliwal
Danielle Rayner
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

I. Ashley

Harjinder Singh Dhaliwal
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
John Doe #1
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Quantum Properties Tamarind Westside Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Kuhn LLP
Quantum Properties Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Kuhn LLP
Quay Pacific Property Management Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Dolden Wallace Folick LLP
Elite Fire Protection Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Brownlee LLP
Lawyer(s)

Hassan Khan

City of Abbotsford
Law Firm / Organization
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Lawyer(s)

Taylor Stone

Abbotsford Fire Rescue Service
Law Firm / Organization
Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Lawyer(s)

Taylor Stone

ABC Co. #1
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

R. Moore

ABC Co. #3
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
ABC Co. #4
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Westley Friesen
Law Firm / Organization
WK Family Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jessica Macdonald

John Doe #3
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
John Doe #4
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
John Doe #5
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
Pamela Ramrup
Law Firm / Organization
Whitelaw Twining (WT BCA LLP)

Background:
Danielle Rayner sued multiple defendants, including Harjinder Singh Dhaliwal and the City of Abbotsford, after a fire on May 3, 2022, damaged a residential complex in Abbotsford, BC. She sought to convert her claim into a class action for affected renters and owners.

Key Legal Issues:

  • Class Action Conversion – Rayner argued a class proceeding was the most efficient way to handle multiple claims.

  • Limitation Period – Defendants claimed the limitation period had expired. The court ruled it was tolled as of October 3, 2022, when Rayner filed her claim, but this did not allow new conventional claims.

  • Defendants’ Liability – Negligence and responsibility for the fire were yet to be determined.

Court Decision:
The court approved the class action conversion, allowing affected individuals to join. Defendants retained the right to raise limitation defences in future proceedings.

Costs and Award:
No monetary award or costs were specified, as the ruling focused on procedural matters.

Supreme Court of British Columbia
S02954
Class actions
Plaintiff