First of Five Inc. v. Recipe Unlimited Corp et al
First of Five Incorporated
Law Firm / Organization
Presvelos Law LLP
Lawyer(s)

Sam A. Presvelos

Recipe Unlimited Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Aird & Berlis LLP
Lawyer(s)

Max Skrow

J.S.M. Corporation (Ontario) Ltd.
Lawyer(s)

David M. Adams

Key Facts:

  • Legal Action: First of Five sought an interlocutory injunction to prevent the defendants, Recipe Unlimited Corporation (franchisor) and J.S.M. Corporation (landlord), from terminating its franchise agreement, lease, and sublease until trial.
  • Background:
    • The franchise agreement began in 2013 with renewal rights for an additional 10 years if terms were met.
    • Defendants alleged several breaches by the plaintiff, issuing five default notices between 2022 and 2023.
    • First of Five Inc. argued the defaults were invalid and that defendants breached their duty of good faith under Ontario's Arthur Wishart Act (AWA).

Legal Issues:

  1. Standard for Injunction:
    • Defendants claimed the injunction was mandatory and required a strong prima facie case, but the court disagreed, treating it as prohibitive and applying the serious issue to be tried standard.
  2. Irreparable Harm:
    • Plaintiff demonstrated that denial of the injunction would cause irreversible harm, including business closure, loss of reputation, and job losses.
  3. Balance of Convenience:
    • Favored the plaintiff, as the injunction preserved its business while trial issues were resolved.

Court's Findings:

  • Serious Issues:
    • Defendants' defaults (e.g., rent disputes, performance audits) raised legitimate issues about compliance with contractual and statutory obligations.
    • The court noted potential breaches of the franchisor's good faith duty under the AWA.
  • Irreparable Harm:
    • Plaintiff's business viability and reputation would suffer damages not compensable by monetary awards.
  • Franchisee’s Conduct:
    • Alleged breaches by the plaintiff, including late payments, were cured or insufficiently material to warrant termination.
  • Costs and Undertaking:
    • Plaintiff’s undertaking as to damages was deemed adequate.

Outcome:

  • Injunction Granted: The defendants were enjoined from enforcing default notices or terminating/denying the agreement renewal until trial.
  • Costs Awarded: $33,114.65 to the plaintiff, with Recipe bearing 85% and J.S.M. 15%.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-27
Corporate & commercial law
$ 33,115
Plaintiff