Add-Vance Service Centre Ltd. v. Triloq Corp.
Add-Vance Service Centre Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Olthuis Van Ert
Lawyer(s)

Dahlia Shuhaibar

Abdalrahman Alhazmy
Law Firm / Organization
Olthuis Van Ert
Lawyer(s)

Dahlia Shuhaibar

Triloq Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Edgar Bray
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Douglas Lee

Key Facts:

  • Court of Appeal for Ontario dealt with the case.
  • The case concerns a commercial lease dispute.

Procedural History:

  1. Default Judgment:
    • January 10, 2023: Mr. Bray and Triloq Corp. were noted in default.
    • April 16, 2024: Default judgment granted by Justice Heather J. Williams.
    • May 13, 2024: Judgment awarded included:
      • Damages: $69,948.75.
      • Costs: $67,400.
      • Prejudgment and postjudgment interest starting April 2024.
  2. Appeal:
    • Edgar Bray attempted to appeal the default judgment.
    • Moving parties filed a motion to quash the notice of appeal.

Court's Decision:

  • The motion to quash was granted because:
    • Default judgments are interlocutory and not appealable as final orders under section 6(1)(b) of the Courts of Justice Act.
    • The proper procedure to challenge a default judgment is a motion to set it aside under Rule 19.08 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
  • Costs Awarded:
    • Bray to pay $7,000 on a substantial indemnity basis, reflecting the unnecessary nature of the motion.

Key Legal Points:

  • Interlocutory Nature of Default Judgments: Confirmed through case law (e.g., 10720143 Canada Corp. v. 2698874 Ontario Inc., 2023 ONCA 463).
  • The motion to set aside is a preferred and efficient remedy for default judgments.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
M55309; COA-24-CV-0560
Corporate & commercial law
$ 144,349
Plaintiff