Lansdowne Office Inc. et al. v. Sheppard et al
CPCS Transcom Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lansdowne Office Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Soloway Wright LLP
Lawyer(s)

Ryan Garrett

Parallel45 Design Group Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
C & W Ottawa Inc. c.o.b. as Cushman & Wakefield Ottawa and Cushman & Wakefield
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Steven Sheppard
Law Firm / Organization
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Lawyer(s)

Anna Husa

SKS Law LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Lawyer(s)

Anna Husa

Key Facts:

  • CPCS alleges overpayment of rent due to a recalculated rentable area by Lansdowne from 7,500 to 9,258 square feet and seeks recovery of excess rent.
  • Lansdowne filed a third-party claim against Mr. Sheppard and SKS, alleging negligence in advising CPCS on the lease's measurement clause.

Legal Issues:

  • Lansdowne's third-party claim sought contribution and indemnity from Mr. Sheppard and SKS under the Negligence Act.
  • The third parties moved to strike the claim under Rule 21.01(1)(b) of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing it disclosed no reasonable cause of action.

Court Analysis:

  1. Legal Principles:

    • A third-party claim must disclose a reasonable cause of action.
    • Under the Negligence Act, contribution and indemnity claims are valid if the third party owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, even if no direct duty exists between the defendant and the third party.
    • Negligence attributable solely to the plaintiff negates such claims.
  2. Arguments:

    • Third Parties: Asserted no independent cause of action against them and claimed that solicitor negligence was time-barred.
    • Lansdowne: Maintained that negligent advice by Mr. Sheppard and SKS, not attributable to CPCS, supported the claim.
  3. Court’s Findings:

    • Allegations of negligence by Mr. Sheppard and SKS could ground a valid claim for contribution and indemnity.
    • Time limitations did not bar such claims under the Negligence Act (Hengeveld v. The Personal Insurance Company applied).

Decision:

  • Motion to strike was dismissed.
  • Costs of $7,189.20 awarded to Lansdowne.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-21-85734
Corporate & commercial law
$ 7,189
Defendant