Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 387 v. Aluminium Window Design Ltd
MIDDLESEX CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION NO. 387
Law Firm / Organization
McCague Borlack LLP
Lawyer(s)

Garett Harper

ALUMINIUM WINDOW DESIGN LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Capo Sgro LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gregory Hemsworth

Case Overview:

  • Claims: Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 387 (Plaintiff) sought over $2 million for defective windows installed in 2014, alleging breach of contract, negligence, and warranty.
  • Outcome: Most claims dismissed; Plaintiff awarded $15,000 for warranty-covered defects.

Key Points:

  1. Trial Context:

    • Conducted virtually during a backlog-reduction initiative in late 2023.
    • Significant procedural challenges due to uncoordinated document management and absence of hyperlinks.
  2. Findings on Merits:

    • Aluminium Window Design Ltd. (Defendant) found liable for warranty breaches on 10 defective windows.
    • Claims of negligence, pure economic loss, and general damages rejected.
  3. Costs Dispute:

    • Plaintiff sought $119,059.06; Defendant sought $178,902.93 (both on a partial indemnity basis).
    • Judge ruled Defendant was the substantially successful party.
    • Costs adjusted due to both parties' poor document organization, prolonging trial duration.
  4. Costs Awarded:

    • Defendant’s costs reduced by $25,000 for procedural inefficiencies.
    • Final award: $125,000 in costs payable by Plaintiff.
  5. Judicial Observations:

    • Emphasized importance of pre-trial agreements on joint document books and compliance with electronic filing protocols.
    • Warned future non-compliance with practice directions may result in further cost sanctions.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-20-00000013-0000
Civil litigation
$ 140,000
Defendant