Background:
The plaintiffs alleged misrepresentation and misfeasance in public office by the City of Maple Ridge. They claimed the City misrepresented conditions affecting property purchased for freight and transloading operations. Post-purchase, the City imposed weight restrictions that hindered business operations, causing revenue losses and reducing property value. The plaintiffs sought $27 million in damages.

Legal Issues:
The case centered on whether the City’s actions constituted misrepresentation and misuse of public office. The defendant requested an adjournment, citing late disclosure of 378 financial records and inconsistencies in expert reports provided by the plaintiffs. The court assessed whether the adjournment was necessary to ensure fairness and address the evidentiary impact of the new disclosures.

Court’s Findings:
The court applied the test for adjournments, balancing factors like timely resolution, prejudice to both parties, and the right to a fair trial. It found that the defendant needed more time to investigate the newly disclosed documents and expert report inconsistencies.

Conclusion and Costs:
The court granted the adjournment, noting the importance of addressing new evidence to prevent a "trial by ambush." The January 6, 2025, trial date was vacated, with no new date set. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs for the application and trial preparation.

No monetary award was made, as the adjournment was procedural.