Hannan Custom Building Ltd. v. Irwin
HANNAN CUSTOM BUILDING LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

S. Sam

TIFFANY IRWIN
Law Firm / Organization
Capo Sgro LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gregory Hemsworth

WILLIAM PATRICK LYNCH
Law Firm / Organization
Capo Sgro LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gregory Hemsworth

THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
Law Firm / Organization
Capo Sgro LLP
Lawyer(s)

Gregory Hemsworth

Key Facts:

  • The case revolves around a lien claim from Hannan Custom Building Ltd. (“Hannan”) for unpaid services and materials in a townhouse renovation project.
  • The defendants, homeowners Irwin and Lynch, engaged DC Builders for the renovations and paid $417,832.51 during the project.
  • Hannan sought $114,027.27 for unpaid invoices but later reduced this claim.
  • The homeowners denied any direct contract with Hannan and acknowledged liability only for the statutory 10% holdback under the Construction Act.

Issues Addressed:

  1. Contractual Relationships:

    • The court determined there was no direct contract between Hannan and the homeowners. Instead, the homeowners had a contract with DC Builders, who subcontracted Hannan.
  2. Lien Validity:

    • Hannan proved a lien of $100,874.05, excluding certain charges deemed non-lienable (e.g., vacation pay for independent contractors).
  3. Homeowners’ Liability:

    • Liability was limited to the 10% statutory holdback amount of $46,854.89, including HST.
  4. Set-Off Claims:

    • The court found valid set-off claims for incomplete or deficient work, including drywall, in-floor heating, and a rain shower head, which offset any remaining contract balance above the holdback amount.

Rulings:

  • Judgment: Hannan was awarded $46,854.89, the amount of the holdback under the Construction Act.
  • Costs and Interest: To be determined, with submissions scheduled.

Key Legal Principles:

  • Contract Formation: Objectively assessed; requires offer, acceptance, and agreement on essential terms.
  • Construction Act Rights: Subcontractors can recover only the statutory holdback unless they have a direct contract with the owner.
  • Lien Exclusions: Costs like voluntary vacation pay for independent contractors are not lienable.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-678548
Civil litigation
$ 46,855
Plaintiff