Overview:
Purolator Inc. sought an interlocutory injunction to prevent members of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers (CUPW) from secondary picketing at its Winnipeg facility during a national Canada Post strike.

Background:
CUPW members picketed Purolator's premises on December 6, 2024, delaying vehicle movement briefly. Purolator claimed the action caused business disruption, alleging it was an unlawful attempt to harm its operations. CUPW argued the picketing was lawful and constitutionally protected.

Legal Issues:
The Court assessed whether secondary picketing violated The Court of King’s Bench Act and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The test for an injunction required showing a strong prima facie case, irreparable harm, and a balance of convenience favoring Purolator.

Court's Analysis:
The Court found delays were minimal (typically four minutes per vehicle), with one exception of 15 minutes, and did not constitute a blockade or tortious conduct. The evidence of operational disruption and harm to reputation lacked sufficient specificity. The Court held that minor inconveniences from lawful, peaceful picketing were tolerable in a democratic society.

Outcome:
The motion for an injunction was dismissed, with the Court emphasizing CUPW’s right to informational picketing. No costs were awarded, as the decision focused on maintaining balance between labour rights and third-party interests.