Lawyers' Professional Indemnity Company v. Sochnyeva
Hanna Sochnyeva
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Dmytro Sochnyev
Law Firm / Organization
Self Represented
Lawyers’ Professional Indemnity Company
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Matthew Bradley

Background:

  • Hanna Sochnyeva sought a review of an earlier decision by Justice George J.A. of the Court of Appeal. The original order dismissed her motions to stay two Divisional Court orders pending leave to appeal.
  • The Divisional Court orders had previously dismissed her motions for leave to appeal.

Key Findings:

  1. No Error in Previous Decision:

    • The court found no error in Justice George’s decision to deny a stay of the two orders.
  2. Mootness of the Case:

    • The case became moot because both motions for leave to appeal had already been dismissed by the court (one as early as October 3, 2023).
    • This dismissal was unknown to the parties at the earlier hearing due to an administrative oversight.
  3. Reconsideration Denied:

    • Ms. Sochnyeva’s motion to reconsider and reinstate her dismissed motion for leave to appeal was also denied.
    • The court found no justification to reverse or set aside its previous decisions.

Disposition:

  • Both the review motion and the motion for reconsideration were dismissed.
  • Costs of $500, inclusive of disbursements and HST, were awarded to the respondent.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
M55272; M55277; M55332
Civil litigation
$ 500
Respondent