Friedrick v Kelturn Drywall Ltd.
Steven Friedrick
Kelturn Drywall Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Barth Law
Lawyer(s)

David R. Barth

Facts:

  • Steven Friedrick, an employee of Kelturn Drywall Ltd. from 2005 to 2017, participated in a Retirement Compensation Arrangement (RCA) established in 2011.
  • From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Friedrick directed approximately $35,000 annually from his bonuses into the RCA.
  • After his employment ended, he discovered that Kelturn made no additional contributions beyond these bonuses.
  • Mr. Friedrick claimed Kelturn breached the RCA terms by failing to contribute further, but the Chambers judge ruled against him, finding no such obligation in the RCA terms.

Legal Issues:

  • Interpretation of the RCA terms regarding Kelturn’s obligation to make contributions beyond employee-directed bonuses.
  • Whether the Chambers judge erred in interpreting the RCA as not requiring additional employer contributions.

Judgment:

  • The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal upheld the Chambers judge's decision.
  • It determined that the RCA intended only to facilitate tax-deferred employee bonuses and imposed no additional obligations on Kelturn to contribute beyond bonuses.

Disposition:

  • The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded to Kelturn Drywall Ltd.

Costs/Award:

  • The total cost awarded was not explicitly stated in the judgment but was granted “in the usual manner.”
Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
CACV4195
Employment law
Respondent