Geigers v Saskatchewan Power Corporation
Mark Geiger
Law Firm / Organization
TTH Law Firm
Lawyer(s)

Ryan Tulloch

Rita Geiger
Law Firm / Organization
TTH Law Firm
Lawyer(s)

Ryan Tulloch

Saskatchewan Power Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
McKercher LLP
Lawyer(s)

Jason M. Clayards

Background:
Mark Geiger and Rita Geiger, owners of 211.66 acres of land and additional parcels in Regina, Saskatchewan, alleged that the Saskatchewan Power Corporation (SPC), a Crown utility, partially expropriated their land for a power line without fair compensation. The expropriation allegedly caused development issues, including the need for costly subdivision fencing.

Legal Issues:
SPC applied to strike portions of the Geigers’ claim, arguing they lacked reasonable causes of action or were frivolous. The disputes included:

  • Overhead Powerline Claim: SPC claimed immunity for overhanging power lines under section 33 of The Power Corporation Act (PCA), and the court struck this portion of the claim.
  • Fence Costs Claim: Geigers argued the expropriation required an $800,000 concrete fence for regulatory compliance. SPC argued the fence was unrelated to the expropriation, but the court allowed the claim to proceed.
  • Nuisance Claim: The Geigers claimed SPC’s expropriation caused unreasonable interference. SPC invoked immunity under the PCA, but the court found the claim arguable.
  • Disturbance Damages Claim: Costs for redevelopment were contested. The court allowed the claim, noting disturbance damages were potentially compensable.
  • Injurious Affection Claim: The court declined to strike claims related to reduced land value, citing unresolved legal questions.

Outcome and Costs:
The court struck one paragraph but dismissed the majority of SPC’s application. No monetary award was determined, and no costs were awarded due to SPC’s limited success.

Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan
KBG-RG-01136-2023
Real estate
Plaintiff