Lamoureux v. Low Murchison Radnoff LLP
Lamoureux
Law Firm / Organization
Caza Saikaley LLP
Low Murchison Radnoff LLP
Law Firm / Organization
Cavanagh LLP
Lawyer(s)

Stephen Cavanagh

  • Case Overview:

    • Pierre Lamoureux (Plaintiff) filed an action against Low Murchison Radnoff LLP (Defendant) following the breakdown of a decade-long professional relationship.
    • The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim after a trial lasting nearly three weeks.
  • Costs Dispute:

    • Defendant sought costs of $222,969.68 on a substantial indemnity basis or $150,152.65 on a partial indemnity basis.
    • Plaintiff opposed the costs but did not submit a detailed bill or challenge the defendant's billing practices.
  • Court's Decision on Costs:

    • Costs were awarded on a partial indemnity basis, fixed at $150,152.65.
    • Substantial indemnity costs were declined because:
      • The plaintiff's serious allegations, while unproven, were sincerely believed and had some basis.
      • The court emphasized that settlement offers should not be used to infer a lack of merit in a case, as this could discourage settlements, which are vital for judicial efficiency.
  • Reasoning for the Decision:

    • Costs awards must reflect fairness and reasonableness, not just actual expenses incurred by the winning party.
    • While the plaintiff’s allegations were not scandalous or outrageous to warrant higher costs, the defendant's conduct was not without flaws.
  • Key Considerations:

    • Settlement offers are critical to justice and should not penalize the offering party.
    • Emotional underpinnings of disputes can influence perceptions and actions but do not necessarily justify elevated cost awards.
  • Outcome:

    • Defendant’s costs were fixed at the partial indemnity level, with payment due within 30 days.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-13-59702
Civil litigation
$ 150,153
Defendant