Royal Bank of Canada v. 1737202 Ontario Inc.
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Aird & Berlis LLP
Lawyer(s)

Josh Suttner

1737202 ONTARIO INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented
KHALID, QAISER
Law Firm / Organization
Unrepresented

Key Issues:

  • RBC sought summary judgment for breach of contractual obligations under a Credit Agreement and Personal Guarantee, as well as defaults under a subsequent Forbearance Agreement.

Key Facts:

  • The defendants:

    • Signed a Credit Agreement (corporate defendant) and a Personal Guarantee (personal defendant).
    • Defaulted on obligations.
    • Entered into a Forbearance Agreement, affirming the enforceability of prior agreements, with independent legal advice.
    • Subsequently defaulted on the Forbearance Agreement as well.
  • Defendants filed a Statement of Defence but did not present evidence or attend the summary judgment motion.

Court’s Analysis:

  1. No Genuine Issue for Trial:

    • Defendants failed to provide evidence supporting their defences.
    • Pleadings alone are insufficient in a summary judgment motion (per KVM Investments Ltd. v. Isabella, 2022 ONSC 4125).
  2. Debt and Interest:

    • Amount owing: $394,121.61 as of September 5, 2023, plus accrued interest and enforcement costs.
    • Pre- and post-judgment interest rates:
      • Corporate defendant: RBC Prime Rate (RBP) + 1.75%.
      • Personal defendant: RBP + 1.75% (until September 13, 2023); RBP + 5% (from September 15, 2023).
  3. Costs:

    • Plaintiff entitled to full indemnity costs of $16,868, found to be reasonable and proportionate.

Outcome:

  • Judgment granted in favor of RBC:
    • Principal amount of $394,121.61 plus interest, costs ($16,868), and legal expenses.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-23-00003580-0000
Banking/Finance
$ 410,990
Plaintiff