Kelly Ann Wood v. Desjardins Financial Security Life Assurance Company, et al.
KELLY ANN WOOD
Law Firm / Organization
Valent Legal
Lawyer(s)

Mike Dull

DESJARDINS FINANCIAL SECURITY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart McKelvey
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
AVIVA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Wilton Martin Litigation Lawyers
Lawyer(s)

Paul Martin

AIG INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
McInnes Cooper
Lawyer(s)

Matthew Hayes

CAA INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
McInnes Cooper
Lawyer(s)

Jillian Kean

CO-OPERATORS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart McKelvey
PAFCO INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
INTACT INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart McKelvey
Lawyer(s)

Renée M. Fontaine

TD HOME AND AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Cox & Palmer
Lawyer(s)

Monika Zauhar

SONNET INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Canty Lutz Grant
Lawyer(s)

Brenda J. Lutz

ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COPMANY OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart McKelvey
Lawyer(s)

Renée M. Fontaine

SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Cox & Palmer
Lawyer(s)

Monika Zauhar

THE PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart McKelvey
PEMBRIDGE INSURANCE COMPANY
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
RBC INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Stewart McKelvey
Lawyer(s)

Stephen Hutchison

Key Issues:

  1. Class Action Amendment: The plaintiff, Kelly Ann Wood, filed a proposed class action alleging breach of contract regarding weekly indemnity benefits under Section B of New Brunswick’s Standard Automobile Policy. The motion sought to:

    • Amend the Statement of Claim.
    • Add Paula Joanne Sirois as a co-representative plaintiff.
    • Add Definity Insurance Company and Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company as defendants.
    • Include additional causes of action (e.g., unjust enrichment, bad faith).
  2. Defendants’ Opposition:

    • Argued that Wood’s non-residency in New Brunswick at filing rendered the class action non-compliant with the Class Proceedings Act (CPA), specifically Section 3(1), which requires at least one resident plaintiff.
    • Claimed potential prejudice due to suspension of limitation periods under Section 41(1) CPA.
  3. Plaintiff’s Position:

    • Asserted no prejudice to defendants due to early case status (no discovery or certification yet).
    • Sought to cure the procedural defect by adding Sirois, a New Brunswick resident.

Court’s Findings:

  • Amendment Standard: Under Rule 27.10 of the New Brunswick Rules of Court, amendments should be allowed unless non-compensable prejudice exists.
  • Certification Pending: The court found it premature to adjudicate substantive issues like the action’s compliance with CPA residency requirements. It emphasized procedural fairness and access to justice.
  • Tolling of Limitation Periods: The court acknowledged potential prejudice but deferred resolution to subsequent motions.

Disposition:

  • Motion granted.
  • Amendments permitted, including the addition of a new representative plaintiff and defendants.
  • No costs awarded.
Court of King's Bench of New Brunswick
MC/265/2022
Insurance law
Plaintiff