Viva Holdings Inc. c 724003 N.B. Inc.
VIVA HOLDINGS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Mario J. Lanteigne

MARC FRENETTE
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Mario J. Lanteigne

THE MARC FRENETTE FAMILY TRUST
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Mario J. Lanteigne

724003 N.B. Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Bingham Law

Subject: Two related claims regarding breaches of a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) for a Honda dealership.

Key Facts:

  • Share Purchase Agreement (SPA): Signed June 1, 2021, for $4,438,079.
    • $3,688,079 paid at closing.
    • $150,000 held in escrow for post-closing adjustments.
    • $750,000 to be paid via preferred shares, redeemable in installments.
  • Dispute Origin: The purchaser provided draft post-closing financial adjustments over five months late, reducing the price by $866,253, alleging unpaid vendor liabilities before the sale.

First Action (BC-21-2022):

  • Claims: Plaintiffs argue:
    • The defendant breached the SPA by missing deadlines for post-closing adjustments.
    • Plaintiffs are entitled to the $150,000 escrow and a waiver of post-closing adjustments.
  • Defenses: Defendant claims delays were caused by vendors' failure to cooperate and alleged bad faith by the vendors (e.g., stopping supplier payments).

Second Action (BC-103-2022):

  • Claims: Plaintiffs allege non-payment of $75,000 installments due under the SPA.
  • Defenses: Defendant asserts a right of set-off due to the adjusted purchase price and alleges bad faith.

Court Findings:

  1. Summary Judgment Denied for Both Actions:

    • Reasoning: Genuine issues requiring a trial exist regarding:
      • Whether vendors implicitly waived their right to enforce deadlines.
      • Allegations of bad faith and breaches of the SPA (e.g., stopping supplier payments affecting the price).
      • Credibility and conduct of both parties.
  2. Costs: Plaintiffs must pay $4,000 in costs.

Key Legal Principles:

  • Strict compliance with contractual terms can be waived by conduct.
  • Duty of honest performance under Canadian contract law requires parties not to mislead or act in bad faith.
Court of King's Bench of New Brunswick
BC-21-2022; BC-103-2022
Corporate & commercial law
$ 4,000
Defendant