MNP Ltd (Eco-Industrial Business Park Inc) v Symmetry Asset Management Inc
MNP Ltd, in its capacity as the Trustee in Bankruptcy of Eco-Industrial Business Park Inc, and not in its personal capacity
Law Firm / Organization
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
Lawyer(s)

Emily Paplawski

Symmetry Asset Management Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Lawyer(s)

Timothy Froese

Main Issue: MNP sought to void the transfer of two legal claims from Eco-Industrial to Symmetry under section 96 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and potentially under provincial legislation for fraudulent transfers.

Key Legal Claims Transferred:

  1. ADT Action: A $100 million lawsuit related to land sale disputes involving Alberta Diluent Terminal Ltd.
  2. Dentons Claim: A potential negligence claim against law firm Dentons Canada LLP.

Findings:

  • Transfers at Undervalue: The court ruled both transfers were undervalued:
    • The Dentons Claim was transferred without any consideration.
    • The ADT Action was transferred for a liability assumption valued at $100,000—far below its fair market value (~$50 million).
  • Insolvency: Eco-Industrial was insolvent at the time of the transfers, evidenced by unpaid debts exceeding US$87 million and property tax arrears of $383,387.
  • Fraudulent Intent: Not addressed as insolvency alone sufficed for relief under section 96 of the BIA.

Court's Decision:

  • Both transfers were voided, restoring the legal claims to the Trustee.
  • MNP retained the right to request additional orders, such as transferring solicitor files related to the claims.

Key Legal Principles Applied:

  • Section 96(1)(b) of the BIA allows voiding of transfers at undervalue made within five years of bankruptcy if the debtor was insolvent or intended to defraud creditors.
  • The remedial purpose of the BIA emphasizes timely and efficient resolution of disputes without unnecessary trials.

Implications:

  • This case reinforces trustees' ability to challenge transactions that undermine creditors' interests.
  • The decision underlines the need for adequate evidence of fair consideration in inter-company transactions involving related parties.
  • No specific monetary amount was granted.
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
B203 806171
Corporate & commercial law
Applicant