14 Nov 2024
McKenzie v. Fabco Holdings Inc.
Claims:
- Fabco Claim: Breach of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale (APS) for a $4.5M property.
- Title Claim: Injurious falsehood and slander of title due to adverse possession assertions by Gerald Anthony.
Key Findings:
-
Fabco APS Breach:
- The APS, agreed upon in 2016, failed to close due to Jaymor (assignee of Fabco) repudiating the contract.
- Jaymor argued the Plaintiffs could not provide marketable title due to Anthony’s adverse possession claim, which the court deemed baseless.
- Plaintiffs were entitled to damages totaling $1,747,633.15, including lost purchase value, interest, and carrying costs. Fabco's $200,000 deposit was forfeited to the Plaintiffs.
-
Title Claim (Against Anthony):
- Anthony’s baseless adverse possession claim and related filings delayed a subsequent sale (Marcello APS, 2017).
- The court found Anthony liable for injurious falsehood and slander of title, awarding $57,790.88 in damages for losses due to the delayed closing.
-
Mitigation and Market Conduct:
- Plaintiffs acted reasonably to mitigate damages by re-listing the property and rejecting unsuitable offers.
-
Counterclaims:
- Defendants’ counterclaims for breach by Plaintiffs were dismissed.
Legal Principles Applied:
- Contract Law: Buyers cannot rescind contracts on speculative title defects unless substantive threats exist (Gajasinghe v. Dewar).
- Torts: Slander of title and injurious falsehood require malice, falsity, and resulting damages.
- Land Titles Act (Ontario): Adverse possession claims do not affect land registered under Land Titles Conversion Qualified.
Disposition:
- Judgments for the Plaintiffs:
- Against Jaymor: $1,747,633.15 (Fabco claim).
- Against Anthony: $57,790.88 (Title claim).
- Pre-judgment interest and costs to be determined if unresolved.