Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 v 1510526 Alberta Ltd
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 also known as Peace Wapiti School Division
Law Firm / Organization
DDC Lawyers LLP
Lawyer(s)

Celina Chan

1510526 Alberta Ltd., operating as Magnum Electric
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
3M Canada Company - Compagnie 3M Canada, operating as 3M Canada
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Graham Construction and Engineering Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
ABC Corporation
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Flint Corp.
Law Firm / Organization
Brownlee LLP
Lawyer(s)

Shad Chapman

  • Case Overview:
    The Plaintiff, Peace Wapiti School Division, sought to amend its Statement of Claim to add Flint Corp. as a defendant or substitute Flint for an existing defendant, ABC Corporation. The case arises from a fire at Whispering Ridge Community School in April 2021, allegedly caused by faulty heat trace tape or its improper installation.

  • Background:

    • The school’s portable units included heat trace tape installed by contractors in 2018.
    • Flint performed maintenance work on the heat trace tape in 2020.
    • Post-fire investigations attributed the cause to heat trace tape malfunctions and potential installation flaws.
    • Flint’s involvement came to light only after a 2024 review revealed Flint had worked on the system in 2020.
  • Legal Issues:

    • Flint argued that the claim was time-barred under Alberta’s Limitations Act, which requires actions to be filed within two years of discovering the cause and parties responsible for an injury.
    • The Court examined whether Peace Wapiti exercised reasonable diligence to identify Flint's role within the limitation period.
  • Court Analysis:

    • The Court found Peace Wapiti acted with due diligence, promptly investigating the fire and suing the apparent responsible parties.
    • Flint’s role only became discoverable after inspections and record reviews in 2024.
  • Decision:

    • The amendment to include Flint as a defendant was granted, as the delay in identifying Flint was reasonable, and no irreparable prejudice to Flint was shown.
    • The decision does not specify any monetary award
Court of King's Bench of Alberta
2304 00237
Civil litigation
Plaintiff