Amaplat Mauritius Ltd. et al v Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation et al
Amaplat Mauritius Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Lenczner Slaght LLP
Lawyer(s)

Katelyn Leonard

Amari Nickel Holdings Zimbabwe Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Lenczner Slaght LLP
Lawyer(s)

Katelyn Leonard

Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation
The Chief Mining Commissioner of the Republic of Zimbabwe

Background:

  • Parties: Applicants are AMAPLAT Mauritius Ltd. and Amari Nickel Holdings Zimbabwe Ltd. Respondents are Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation and the Chief Mining Commissioner of Zimbabwe.
  • Legal Basis: Application under Rule 14.05 of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure to recognize and enforce a High Court of Zambia judgment in Canada.

Key Issues:

  1. Counsel Withdrawal: Respondents' counsel moved to withdraw under Rule 15.04.
  2. Substituted Service: Applicants requested substituted service of documents electronically, given procedural and substantive challenges.

Court’s Findings:

  • Withdrawal of Counsel: The court approved the withdrawal, finding it justifiable based on submitted materials.
  • Substituted Service:
    • Approved as necessary due to Zimbabwe not being a party to the Hague Convention and the Applicants' need to prevent delays.
    • Authorized service via electronic mail to the Respondents’ representatives and U.S. counsel, who are involved in related U.S. proceedings.
    • Found to align with Rules 16.01(4) and 16.04(1), ensuring procedural fairness and efficiency.
    • Does not contravene the State Immunity Act as it pertains to non-originating processes.

Order:

  • The court issued an immediate and enforceable order for substituted service, effective unless Respondents appoint new counsel or provide alternate email addresses.
  • No monetary award specified.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-22-00684792-00CL
Corporate & commercial law
$ 0
Applicant
29 July 2022