Goegler v. Royal Bank of Canada
ANNE GOEGLER
Law Firm / Organization
Brauti Thorning LLP
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
MARTIN BRENNAN also known as John Doe
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
HUSPHERE INTEGRATED SERVICES LTD.
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Key Facts:

  • Anne Goegler (Applicant) was defrauded by Martin Brennan (alias John Doe) after meeting him on a dating app.
  • Brennan convinced Goegler to wire €290,000 (approx. CAD $430,000) to an account under Husphere Integrated Services Ltd.
  • The Applicant sought a freezing order and a tracing order to recover the funds.

Procedural History:

  • Service of Notice:
    • Husphere was served via mail at its registered office.
    • Brennan was served through email and WhatsApp, his known communication methods with the Applicant.
    • The Royal Bank of Canada (Respondent) was also properly served and did not oppose the application.

Court’s Findings:

  • The court found Goegler’s affidavit credible, noting a familiar pattern of fraud.
  • Cited legal principles:
    • Money transferred under a mistake of fact is recoverable (B.M.P. Global Distribution Inc. v. Bank of Nova Scotia).
    • No intention by Goegler for Brennan or Husphere to benefit from the funds, nor was there any consideration provided by them (McGuinty Law Offices v. 13819850 Canada Inc.).
    • It would be inequitable for Brennan or Husphere to retain the funds obtained under false pretenses (CIBC v. Bloomforex Corp.).

Relief Granted:

  • The court granted all relief sought by the Applicant, including a freezing and tracing order.
  • An earlier, discontinued application file containing personal details was sealed to protect the Applicant’s privacy.

Conclusion:

  • The court issued an order in favor of Goegler, allowing her to proceed with efforts to recover her misappropriated funds.
  • No specific mention of costs or additional damages is made in the decision..
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-24-00718655
Civil litigation
Applicant