Castle Building Centres Group Limited v. Parkes
Castle Building Centres Group Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Dentons Canada LLP
Lawyer(s)

Mark A. Freake

Steven Parkes
Law Firm / Organization
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Jeff Parkes
Law Firm / Organization
Gardiner Roberts LLP

Background: Castle Building Centres sought bankruptcy orders against Steven and Jeff Parkes under s. 43(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) for $2.2 million owed due to personal guarantees related to their company, The Rehill Company Ltd., which went bankrupt in 2021.

Parkes’ Arguments:

  1. No Debt Owed: They claimed Castle waived Jeff’s guarantee and that the debt was actually owed to a subsidiary, CBS.
  2. Improper Purpose: Alleged Castle was using bankruptcy to intimidate other members.
  3. Medical Hardship: Jeff argued his poor health should prevent the bankruptcy order.
  4. Bilateral Dispute: Asserted no general insolvency affecting other creditors.

Court’s Findings:

  • Debt Validity: The court ruled prior judgments were final and binding (res judicata) and could not be re-litigated.
  • Waiver & CBS Claims: Found no evidence of waiver or that the debt was owed to CBS.
  • Set-Off for Rebates: Dismissed for lack of supporting evidence.
  • Discretion Under s. 43(7): The court held that Castle had a valid purpose in enforcing the debt and the Parkes’ failure to cooperate with enforcement justified the bankruptcy orders.

Conclusion: The bankruptcy orders were granted, as the Parkes failed to show sufficient cause to oppose them. The court emphasized Castle’s right to enforce the debt after repeated non-payment and resistance by the Parkes.

no new monetary award for damages or costs for this specific decision.

Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
BK-24-00208667-OT31
Bankruptcy & insolvency
Applicant