Krieser v. Seligman
Shari Krieser
George Krieser
Gregory Evan Seligman
Lawyer(s)

Glenn Brandys

Law Firm / Organization
Michael L. Shell Litigation
Lawyer(s)

Michael L. Shell

Vintage Landscape Contractors Limited
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Greenstone Gardens Inc.
Lawyer(s)

Glenn Brandys

Law Firm / Organization
Michael L. Shell Litigation
Lawyer(s)

Michael L. Shell

G.E.S. Construction Limited
Lawyer(s)

Glenn Brandys

Law Firm / Organization
Michael L. Shell Litigation
Lawyer(s)

Michael L. Shell

Eduardo Leal
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Background:

  • In 2004, the Kriesers hired G.E.S. Construction to build a house in Toronto. Disputes over unpaid invoices and construction deficiencies led to lawsuits in 2007.
  • The trial court dismissed the Kriesers' claims and awarded G.E.S. $92,589.90 and Greenstone Gardens $20,084.95 for unpaid invoices.

Appeal Issues:

  1. Breach of Contract:

    • The Kriesers argued the trial judge erred in ruling that their non-payment breached the contract, barring warranty claims.
    • The Court upheld this decision, citing their clear breach of Section 4.1(a) by withholding payments.
  2. Construction Deficiencies:

    • They claimed the trial judge overlooked 63 deficiencies listed in an expert report.
    • The Court found no basis for a retrial due to insufficient evidence that linked these deficiencies to the contractual warranty period.
  3. Fiduciary Duty:

    • The Kriesers argued G.E.S. breached a fiduciary duty. The Court agreed with the trial judge that the relationship was strictly commercial.

Outcome:

  • Appeal dismissed; costs of $35,000 awarded to the respondents.
  • The trial judge’s cost award of $477,703.14 was upheld.

This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to contractual obligations and presenting clear evidence for claims.

Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-CV-1252
Civil litigation
$ 35,000
Respondent