1785192 Ontario Inc. v. Ontario H Limited Partnership
1785192 Ontario Inc.
Law Firm / Organization
Lenczner Slaght LLP
1043303 Ontario Ltd.
Law Firm / Organization
Lenczner Slaght LLP
Ontario H Limited Partnership
Law Firm / Organization
Stikeman Elliott LLP
Lawyer(s)

Aaron Kreaden

Key Facts:

  • 1785192 Ontario Inc. (Tenant) leased two properties with an option to purchase. The purchase price was to be the average of appraisals from each party.
  • Appraisals varied significantly: $11,746,000 (Tenant) vs. $31,200,000 (Landlord), resulting in a midpoint of $21,473,000.
  • The Tenant attempted to close by tendering only $11,746,000 and holding the difference in trust. Ontario H Limited Partnership (Landlord) refused to convey the properties under these terms.

Lower Court:

  • Ordered specific performance for the Tenant at the midpoint price, $21,473,000.

Court of Appeal:

  • Reversed: Held that the Tenant failed to exercise the option correctly by not tendering the full midpoint amount.
  • The court ruled partial payment with the balance held in trust did not fulfill the purchase obligation.
  • Strict adherence to option terms was required; the Landlord was not obliged to accept partial payment.
  • Relief from forfeiture was denied as the Tenant, a sophisticated party, assumed the risk of its approach.

Outcome:

  • The appeal was allowed, options were declared null, and the Landlord was awarded costs totaling $243,000.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-24-CV-0331
Real estate
$ 243,000
Respondent