Behold Control Equipment Inc. v. Race Mechanical Systems Inc.
BEHOLD CONTROL EQUIPMENT INC.
RACE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INC.
Law Firm / Organization
M. Singh Law Professional Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Manjit Singh

2700009 ONTARIO INC. (C.O.B. as AQUIRE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT SERVICES)
Law Firm / Organization
M. Singh Law Professional Corporation
Lawyer(s)

Manjit Singh

Background:

  • Behold Control Equipment Inc. ("Behold") sued Race Mechanical Systems Inc. ("RACE") and 2700009 Ontario Inc. (doing business as Aquire Facilities Management Services) alleging:
    • Misappropriation and misuse of confidential information.
    • Breaches of contract, duty of good faith, and confidence.
    • Intentional interference with economic relations.
  • The defendants denied liability and countersued Behold and its CEO, Trevor Strauss.
  • The trial is scheduled to begin on November 14, 2024.

Motion for Confidentiality:

  • Behold sought a pre-trial sealing order for 26 documents containing:
    1. Technical specifications of Behold’s HVACR system.
    2. Pricing and profitability information.
  • Behold argued that public disclosure would harm their competitive edge.
  • The defendants and Starbucks (a non-party involved in document production) did not oppose the motion, but the defendants contested the confidentiality and enforceability of the related agreements.

Court’s Decision:

  • Motion Denied: The court, presided by Justice Sanfilippo, declined to grant the sealing order but allowed Behold to renew the request at trial.
  • Key Reasons:
    • The evidence presented was insufficient to meet the Sherman test for limiting court openness, which requires proving:
      1. A serious risk to a public interest.
      2. No reasonable alternatives to the order.
      3. Proportional benefits outweighing negative effects on transparency.
    • The documents in question are central to the trial, especially regarding claims of confidentiality and contractual validity.
    • The court emphasized that confidentiality should be determined with a full trial record, rather than pre-trial, to avoid premature rulings that could affect the trial's fairness.
  • No definitive successful party.
  • No monetary award specified.
Superior Court of Justice - Ontario
CV-19-00633450-0000
Corporate & commercial law