Background:
Masjoody sued for defamation over an article summarizing a previous court decision involving his employment termination at Simon Fraser University (SFU). The original case, which Masjoody lost, involved claims against SFU and a colleague for defamation and harassment, but was dismissed as an employment matter. Two appeals by Masjoody were unsuccessful.

Legal Issues and Arguments:
The defendants sought to dismiss the current suit under British Columbia’s Protection of Public Participation Act (PPPA), designed to prevent SLAPP actions that limit public interest debate. They argued the article was fair, accurate, and protected under privilege and fair comment defenses. They invoked Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, asserting the report was in the public interest.

Court's Analysis and Decision:
The court found the article met PPPA’s public interest threshold, ruling Masjoody failed to demonstrate substantial harm or disprove the defendants' defenses. Justice Ball determined the article was accurate and privileged, dismissing Masjoody’s claim as verging on vexatious litigation.

Costs Awarded:
Costs were awarded to the defendants, designated as payable forthwith after assessment, at ordinary difficulty. Financial terms were not specified.