Kelly McQuade et al. v. Attorney General of Canada
Kelly McQuade
Law Firm / Organization
Wagners Law Firm
David Combden
Law Firm / Organization
Wagners Law Firm
Graham Walsh
Law Firm / Organization
Wagners Law Firm
Attorney General of Canada, representing His Majesty the King in Right of Canada

- Parties: The appellants were Kelly McQuade, David Combden, and Graham Walsh. The respondent was the Attorney General of Canada, representing His Majesty the King in Right of Canada.

- Subject Matter: The appellants sought to set aside a motion judge's order dismissing the plaintiffs’ motion for certification but granting leave to amend a second fresh as amended statement of claim. The decision held that s. 9 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act, 1985 barred the claims of the proposed representative plaintiffs and the proposed class members who received or were eligible for a disability pension under s. 32 of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act, 1985 and the Pension Act, 1985. This case is ongoing.

- Date: The hearing was set on Oct. 28, 2024.

- Venue: This was a federal case before the Federal Court of Appeal.

- Amount: No financial award was specified.

Federal Court of Appeal
A-206-23
Pensions & benefits law
$ 0
19 August 2023