GlycoBioSciences Inc. (Glyco) v. MAGNA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Magna)
GlycoBioSciences Inc. (“Glyco”)
Law Firm / Organization
GlycoBioSciences Inc.
Lawyer(s)

Kevin Drizen

MAGNA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Magna”)
Law Firm / Organization
Lenczner Slaght LLP
Industria Farmaceutica Andromaco, SA., de C.V. (“Andromaco”)
Law Firm / Organization
Lenczner Slaght LLP
Montebello Packaging (“Montebello”)
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified
Nadro S.A.P.I. de C.V. (“Nadro”)
Law Firm / Organization
Not Specified

Background:

  • Parties:

    • GlycoBioSciences Inc. (Glyco) (Appellant)
    • MAGNA Pharmaceuticals Inc., Industria Farmaceutica Andromaco S.A., Montebello Packaging, Nadro S.A.P.I. (Respondents)
  • Dispute: Related to contracts concerning the manufacture and distribution of a "Wound Gel" product. Contracts had arbitration/forum clauses not favoring Ontario.

  • Legal Issue: Glyco's President, Mr. Drizen (a non-lawyer), sought leave to represent Glyco in court. The motion judge had denied this request, raising issues of financial uncertainty and concerns over Mr. Drizen's conduct in litigation.

Preliminary Issues:

  1. Representation by a Non-Lawyer: Respondents objected to Mr. Drizen arguing on behalf of Glyco. The panel allowed it since the decision denying representation was still under review.

  2. Fresh Evidence: Financial records were introduced to support claims of Glyco's financial status but were not directly reviewed by the motion judge.

Decision:

  • Motion Denied: The court found no legal error or unreasonable result in the original motion judge’s decision.
  • Reasoning: The judge correctly considered access to justice concerns, Glyco's uncertain financial standing, and Mr. Drizen’s problematic conduct.

Costs:

  • Glyco was ordered to pay partial indemnity costs of $4,916.86 to each responding party.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
M55197; M55199; COA-24-CV-0270; COA-24-CV-0417
Corporate & commercial law
$ 4,917
Respondent