Applicant
Respondent
Background:
Parties:
Dispute: Related to contracts concerning the manufacture and distribution of a "Wound Gel" product. Contracts had arbitration/forum clauses not favoring Ontario.
Legal Issue: Glyco's President, Mr. Drizen (a non-lawyer), sought leave to represent Glyco in court. The motion judge had denied this request, raising issues of financial uncertainty and concerns over Mr. Drizen's conduct in litigation.
Preliminary Issues:
Representation by a Non-Lawyer: Respondents objected to Mr. Drizen arguing on behalf of Glyco. The panel allowed it since the decision denying representation was still under review.
Fresh Evidence: Financial records were introduced to support claims of Glyco's financial status but were not directly reviewed by the motion judge.
Decision:
Costs:
Court
Court of Appeal for OntarioCase Number
M55197; M55199; COA-24-CV-0270; COA-24-CV-0417Practice Area
Corporate & commercial lawAmount
$ 4,917Winner
RespondentTrial Start Date
Download documents